PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHE vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHE vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chemed Corporation (CHE) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHE achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 11.85% return. Over the past 10 years, CHE has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 12.84%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.34% annualized return.


CHE

1D
2.31%
1M
0.36%
YTD
0.03%
6M
-0.66%
1Y
-24.49%
3Y*
-7.33%
5Y*
-2.71%
10Y*
12.84%

COST

1D
0.79%
1M
-5.03%
YTD
11.85%
6M
4.58%
1Y
-8.37%
3Y*
25.00%
5Y*
21.24%
10Y*
22.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHE vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHE
Chemed Corporation
0.03%-18.87%-9.11%14.90%-3.22%-0.38%21.59%55.58%17.01%52.32%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
11.85%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CHE and COST is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 1993

0.25

Fundamentals

EPS

CHE:

$18.29

COST:

$26.51

PE Ratio

CHE:

23.34

COST:

36.29

PEG Ratio

CHE:

10.99

COST:

2.84

PS Ratio

CHE:

2.39

COST:

1.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHE:

$2.54B

COST:

$293.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHE:

$571.36M

COST:

$11.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

CHE:

$396.47M

COST:

$12.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHE vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHE
CHE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHE vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chemed Corporation (CHE) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHECOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.94

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.44

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

-0.88

-0.23

CHE vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHE Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHE and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHECOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.75

-0.44

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.94

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

1.02

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.59

-0.27

Drawdowns

CHE vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHE drawdown since its inception was -83.78%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHE and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHECOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.78%

-53.39%

-30.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.20%

-18.95%

-15.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.88%

-20.74%

-22.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.88%

-31.40%

-11.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.88%

-31.40%

-11.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.76%

-12.11%

-21.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.45%

-13.36%

-3.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.99%

9.86%

+13.13%

Volatility

CHE vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chemed Corporation (CHE) is 5.38%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 8.05%. This indicates that CHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHECOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

8.05%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.06%

14.83%

+9.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.91%

19.12%

+13.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.21%

22.73%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.84%

21.95%

+3.89%

Dividends

CHE vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

CHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, which matches COST's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHE
Chemed Corporation
0.56%0.51%0.34%0.27%0.29%0.26%0.25%0.28%0.41%0.44%0.62%0.61%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.56%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%

Financials

CHE vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chemed Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
657.51M
70.53B
(CHE) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CHE vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Chemed Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-30.0%-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%202220232024202520260
-25.1%
Portfolio components
CHE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chemed Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 657.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.

CHE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chemed Corporation reported an operating income of 84.58M and revenue of 657.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

CHE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chemed Corporation reported a net income of 66.30M and revenue of 657.51M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHE and COST have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COST has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to CHE (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHE dropped -83.78% vs COST's -53.39%.

COST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHE and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer