CHDVD.SW vs. VIG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Swiss Dividend ETF (CH) (CHDVD.SW) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG).
CHDVD.SW and VIG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHDVD.SW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the SPI® Select Dividend 20 Index. It was launched on Apr 28, 2014. VIG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index. It was launched on Apr 21, 2006. Both CHDVD.SW and VIG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CHDVD.SW or VIG.
Key characteristics
| CHDVD.SW | VIG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.36% | 20.60% |
| 1Y Return | 16.73% | 29.90% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.72% | 8.71% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.11% | 13.04% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.98% | 11.97% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.57 | 3.16 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.18 | 4.43 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.59 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.29 | 6.23 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.98 | 20.81 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.81% | 1.52% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.38% | 9.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.09% | -46.81% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.78% | -0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHDVD.SW and VIG is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CHDVD.SW vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CHDVD.SW achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly lower than VIG's 20.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CHDVD.SW has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 7.98%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.97% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHDVD.SW vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHDVD.SW has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CHDVD.SW vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Swiss Dividend ETF (CH) (CHDVD.SW) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CHDVD.SW vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
CHDVD.SW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than VIG's 1.69% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHDVD.SW iShares Swiss Dividend ETF (CH) | 3.81% | 3.48% | 3.48% | 2.92% | 3.07% | 3.25% | 3.83% | 3.50% | 2.70% | 3.13% | 0.34% | 0.00% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.69% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% | 1.95% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
CHDVD.SW vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHDVD.SW drawdown since its inception was -30.09%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHDVD.SW and VIG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CHDVD.SW vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Swiss Dividend ETF (CH) (CHDVD.SW) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) have volatilities of 3.56% and 3.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.