PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CHAT vs. FFOG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and FFOG is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

CHAT vs. FFOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
18.21%
18.70%
CHAT
FFOG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CHAT:

0.84

FFOG:

1.46

Sortino Ratio

CHAT:

1.24

FFOG:

2.02

Omega Ratio

CHAT:

1.17

FFOG:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

CHAT:

1.19

FFOG:

2.14

Martin Ratio

CHAT:

3.53

FFOG:

7.85

Ulcer Index

CHAT:

6.38%

FFOG:

4.13%

Daily Std Dev

CHAT:

26.85%

FFOG:

22.30%

Max Drawdown

CHAT:

-18.98%

FFOG:

-15.14%

Current Drawdown

CHAT:

-9.13%

FFOG:

-4.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than FFOG's 1.35% return.


CHAT

YTD

-0.82%

1M

-3.07%

6M

15.48%

1Y

22.91%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FFOG

YTD

1.35%

1M

-0.93%

6M

16.61%

1Y

32.45%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CHAT vs. FFOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FFOG's 0.55% expense ratio.


CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
Expense ratio chart for CHAT: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for FFOG: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CHAT vs. FFOG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CHAT is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CHAT is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CHAT is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CHAT is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CHAT is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CHAT is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FFOG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFOG is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFOG is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFOG is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFOG is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFOG is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFOG is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CHAT vs. FFOG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CHAT, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.841.46
The chart of Sortino ratio for CHAT, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.242.02
The chart of Omega ratio for CHAT, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.171.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for CHAT, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.192.14
The chart of Martin ratio for CHAT, currently valued at 3.53, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.537.85
CHAT
FFOG

The current CHAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the FFOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAT and FFOG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.50Nov 10Nov 17Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15Dec 22Dec 29Jan 05Jan 12Jan 19Jan 26
0.84
1.46
CHAT
FFOG

Dividends

CHAT vs. FFOG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHAT nor FFOG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. FFOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -18.98%, which is greater than FFOG's maximum drawdown of -15.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and FFOG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-9.13%
-4.66%
CHAT
FFOG

Volatility

CHAT vs. FFOG - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a higher volatility of 11.72% compared to Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) at 7.59%. This indicates that CHAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
11.72%
7.59%
CHAT
FFOG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab