PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CHAT vs. FFOG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CHATFFOG
YTD Return13.18%25.47%
Daily Std Dev24.90%21.32%
Max Drawdown-18.98%-15.14%
Current Drawdown-11.04%-5.53%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between CHAT and FFOG is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CHAT vs. FFOG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly lower than FFOG's 25.47% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-2.45%
5.84%
CHAT
FFOG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CHAT vs. FFOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FFOG's 0.55% expense ratio.


CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
Expense ratio chart for CHAT: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for FFOG: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CHAT vs. FFOG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHAT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CHAT, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CHAT, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.55
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CHAT, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CHAT, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CHAT, currently valued at 4.23, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.23
FFOG
Sharpe ratio
No data

CHAT vs. FFOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

CHAT vs. FFOG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHAT nor FFOG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. FFOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -18.98%, which is greater than FFOG's maximum drawdown of -15.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and FFOG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-11.04%
-5.53%
CHAT
FFOG

Volatility

CHAT vs. FFOG - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) at 6.96%. This indicates that CHAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
7.87%
6.96%
CHAT
FFOG