PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGO.TO vs. PPL.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CGO.TOPPL.TO
YTD Return12.76%34.05%
1Y Return40.23%40.69%
3Y Return (Ann)-3.36%18.50%
5Y Return (Ann)-6.70%10.71%
10Y Return (Ann)3.67%9.20%
Sharpe Ratio1.753.60
Sortino Ratio2.634.81
Omega Ratio1.321.66
Calmar Ratio0.863.79
Martin Ratio4.2929.85
Ulcer Index10.13%1.36%
Daily Std Dev24.79%11.23%
Max Drawdown-86.01%-68.76%
Current Drawdown-30.35%-1.77%

Fundamentals


CGO.TOPPL.TO
Market CapCA$591.96MCA$33.49B
EPSCA$8.55CA$3.29
PE Ratio7.2717.54
PEG Ratio2.331.36
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$3.07BCA$7.73B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$683.61MCA$2.92B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$1.09BCA$2.42B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CGO.TO and PPL.TO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CGO.TO vs. PPL.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CGO.TO achieves a 12.76% return, which is significantly lower than PPL.TO's 34.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CGO.TO has underperformed PPL.TO with an annualized return of 3.67%, while PPL.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.20% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.62%
16.08%
CGO.TO
PPL.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGO.TO vs. PPL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cogeco Inc. (CGO.TO) and Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGO.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGO.TO, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.52
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGO.TO, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CGO.TO, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGO.TO, currently valued at 0.73, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.73
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CGO.TO, currently valued at 3.59, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.59
PPL.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PPL.TO, currently valued at 2.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PPL.TO, currently valued at 3.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.67
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PPL.TO, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.50
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PPL.TO, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.98
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PPL.TO, currently valued at 21.57, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0021.57

CGO.TO vs. PPL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the PPL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGO.TO and PPL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.52
2.79
CGO.TO
PPL.TO

Dividends

CGO.TO vs. PPL.TO - Dividend Comparison

CGO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, more than PPL.TO's 4.63% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CGO.TO
Cogeco Inc.
5.72%5.32%4.12%2.81%2.43%1.70%2.75%1.56%2.16%2.07%1.50%1.61%
PPL.TO
Pembina Pipeline Corporation
4.63%5.83%5.57%6.57%8.37%4.90%5.53%4.48%4.52%5.97%4.06%4.40%

Drawdowns

CGO.TO vs. PPL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGO.TO drawdown since its inception was -86.01%, which is greater than PPL.TO's maximum drawdown of -68.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGO.TO and PPL.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-36.76%
-3.61%
CGO.TO
PPL.TO

Volatility

CGO.TO vs. PPL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Cogeco Inc. (CGO.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO) at 5.24%. This indicates that CGO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.78%
5.24%
CGO.TO
PPL.TO

Financials

CGO.TO vs. PPL.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cogeco Inc. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items