PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGMU vs. FFRHX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CGMU and FFRHX is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

CGMU vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%20.00%22.00%24.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
14.75%
23.78%
CGMU
FFRHX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CGMU:

1.01

FFRHX:

3.30

Sortino Ratio

CGMU:

1.43

FFRHX:

9.89

Omega Ratio

CGMU:

1.20

FFRHX:

3.37

Calmar Ratio

CGMU:

1.37

FFRHX:

9.49

Martin Ratio

CGMU:

5.30

FFRHX:

49.47

Ulcer Index

CGMU:

0.64%

FFRHX:

0.17%

Daily Std Dev

CGMU:

3.34%

FFRHX:

2.47%

Max Drawdown

CGMU:

-4.10%

FFRHX:

-22.19%

Current Drawdown

CGMU:

-1.24%

FFRHX:

-0.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGMU achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly lower than FFRHX's 8.09% return.


CGMU

YTD

2.82%

1M

-0.09%

6M

1.59%

1Y

3.38%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FFRHX

YTD

8.09%

1M

0.00%

6M

3.98%

1Y

8.26%

5Y*

5.35%

10Y*

4.78%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGMU vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGMU has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.


FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
Expense ratio chart for FFRHX: current value at 0.67% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.67%
Expense ratio chart for CGMU: current value at 0.27% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.27%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGMU vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGMU, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.923.30
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGMU, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.309.89
The chart of Omega ratio for CGMU, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.183.37
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGMU, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.259.49
The chart of Martin ratio for CGMU, currently valued at 4.82, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.8249.47
CGMU
FFRHX

The current CGMU Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGMU and FFRHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.92
3.30
CGMU
FFRHX

Dividends

CGMU vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

CGMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than FFRHX's 7.67% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CGMU
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
3.21%3.09%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.67%8.25%5.06%3.27%3.85%5.17%4.75%4.01%3.94%4.25%4.00%3.46%

Drawdowns

CGMU vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGMU drawdown since its inception was -4.10%, smaller than the maximum FFRHX drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMU and FFRHX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-2.50%-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-1.24%
-0.32%
CGMU
FFRHX

Volatility

CGMU vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.31%. This indicates that CGMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.81%
0.31%
CGMU
FFRHX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab