PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGMS vs. SOXQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CGMS and SOXQ is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

CGMS vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.52%
9.22%
CGMS
SOXQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CGMS:

1.59

SOXQ:

0.46

Sortino Ratio

CGMS:

2.30

SOXQ:

0.84

Omega Ratio

CGMS:

1.29

SOXQ:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

CGMS:

3.75

SOXQ:

0.67

Martin Ratio

CGMS:

10.19

SOXQ:

1.48

Ulcer Index

CGMS:

0.71%

SOXQ:

11.37%

Daily Std Dev

CGMS:

4.54%

SOXQ:

36.26%

Max Drawdown

CGMS:

-3.79%

SOXQ:

-46.01%

Current Drawdown

CGMS:

-0.51%

SOXQ:

-14.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGMS achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 0.71% return.


CGMS

YTD

0.51%

1M

0.51%

6M

2.52%

1Y

6.51%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SOXQ

YTD

0.71%

1M

0.71%

6M

9.23%

1Y

18.04%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGMS vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGMS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.00% expense ratio.


CGMS
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for CGMS: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%
Expense ratio chart for SOXQ: current value at 0.00% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGMS vs. SOXQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGMS is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGMS is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGMS is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGMS is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGMS is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGMS is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SOXQ is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SOXQ is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SOXQ is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SOXQ is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SOXQ is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SOXQ is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CGMS vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGMS, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.590.46
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGMS, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.300.84
The chart of Omega ratio for CGMS, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.291.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGMS, currently valued at 3.75, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.750.67
The chart of Martin ratio for CGMS, currently valued at 10.19, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.191.48
CGMS
SOXQ

The current CGMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the SOXQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGMS and SOXQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.59
0.46
CGMS
SOXQ

Dividends

CGMS vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison

CGMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than SOXQ's 0.68% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
CGMS
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF
5.39%5.91%5.84%0.97%0.00%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.68%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.73%

Drawdowns

CGMS vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGMS drawdown since its inception was -3.79%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMS and SOXQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.51%
-14.83%
CGMS
SOXQ

Volatility

CGMS vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) is 1.36%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 12.49%. This indicates that CGMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.36%
12.49%
CGMS
SOXQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab