CGMS vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CGMS (Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - CGMS is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. CGMS is actively managed, while GLDM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGMS returned 8.00%/yr vs 28.79%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGMS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

CGMS vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGMS achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -4.72% return.

CGMS

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 1.54%
• 6M: 1.60%
• 1Y: 5.89%
• 3Y*: 8.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLDM

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -8.82%
• YTD: -4.72%
• 6M: -8.62%
• 1Y: 21.66%
• 3Y*: 28.79%
• 5Y*: 18.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGMS vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGMS Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF	1.54%	7.52%	7.24%	11.51%	2.77%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	-4.72%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	9.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CGMS and GLDM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022	0.27

Return for Risk

CGMS vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGMS

CGMS Risk / Return Rank: 54
CGMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CGMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CGMS Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CGMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CGMS Martin Ratio Rank: 62

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 22
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 25
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGMS vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGMS	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	0.80	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	1.15	+1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.17	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	0.89	+1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.60	2.40	+8.19

CGMS vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGMS and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGMS vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGMS drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -24.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMS and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGMS	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-24.35%	+20.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.47%	-24.35%	+21.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.08%	-24.35%	+20.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-23.82%	+23.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.66%	-6.32%	+5.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.56%	9.05%	-8.49%

Volatility

CGMS vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) is 1.12%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that CGMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGMS	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.12%	8.16%	-7.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.78%	24.22%	-21.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.50%	27.36%	-23.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.12%	18.15%	-13.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.12%	17.02%	-11.90%

CGMS vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGMS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGMS vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

CGMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGMS Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF	6.09%	6.00%	5.91%	5.84%	0.97%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGMS and GLDM in my portfolio?

CGMS and GLDM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGMS or GLDM?

GLDM has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to CGMS (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGMS dropped -4.08% vs GLDM's -24.35%.

Which ETF is better, CGMS or GLDM?

On 3-year performance, GLDM leads with 28.79% vs 8.00% for CGMS. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, CGMS has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGMS or GLDM?

Over the 3-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 28.79% return vs 8.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGMS or GLDM?

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGMS or GLDM?

CGMS has the higher dividend yield at 6.09%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

What is the main difference between CGMS and GLDM?

CGMS is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while GLDM is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGMS and 0.10% for GLDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.