CGL.TO vs. XBB.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF (XBB.TO).
CGL.TO and XBB.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGL.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Gold Bullion. It was launched on May 28, 2009. XBB.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD. It was launched on Nov 20, 2000. Both CGL.TO and XBB.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CGL.TO or XBB.TO.
Key characteristics
| CGL.TO | XBB.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.97% | -1.48% |
| 1Y Return | 18.41% | 2.27% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.18% | -1.50% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.94% | 0.08% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.16% | 1.71% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.46 | 0.30 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.60% | 7.32% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.96% | -18.16% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.78% | -10.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGL.TO and XBB.TO is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CGL.TO vs. XBB.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CGL.TO achieves a 14.97% return, which is significantly higher than XBB.TO's -1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, CGL.TO has outperformed XBB.TO with an annualized return of 5.16%, while XBB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.71% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGL.TO vs. XBB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGL.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XBB.TO's 0.10% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CGL.TO vs. XBB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF (XBB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CGL.TO vs. XBB.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XBB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGL.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XBB.TO iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF | 3.18% | 3.01% | 2.91% | 2.54% | 2.55% | 2.80% | 2.92% | 2.83% | 2.81% | 2.87% | 3.04% | 3.32% |
Drawdowns
CGL.TO vs. XBB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGL.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.96%, which is greater than XBB.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGL.TO and XBB.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CGL.TO vs. XBB.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF (XBB.TO) at 2.34%. This indicates that CGL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.