CGGR vs. MMYT
CGGR (Capital Group Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while MMYT (MakeMyTrip Limited) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, CGGR returned 25.62%/yr vs 17.83%/yr for MMYT. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGGR vs. MMYT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGGR achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly higher than MMYT's -45.00% return.
CGGR
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 6.29%
- 1Y
- 21.70%
- 3Y*
- 25.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMYT
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- -4.02%
- YTD
- -45.00%
- 6M
- -39.64%
- 1Y
- -55.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
CGGR vs. MMYT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | 6.16% | 19.75% | 32.12% | 42.18% | -18.50% |
MMYT MakeMyTrip Limited | -45.00% | -26.86% | 139.00% | 70.40% | 9.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGGR and MMYT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.48 |
The correlation between CGGR and MMYT shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGGR vs. MMYT — Risk / Return Rank
CGGR
MMYT
CGGR vs. MMYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) and MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGGR | MMYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.78 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | -0.86 | +2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.31 | -1.61 | +6.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGGR | MMYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | -1.14 | +2.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.06 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
CGGR vs. MMYT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGGR drawdown since its inception was -28.90%, smaller than the maximum MMYT drawdown of -73.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGR and MMYT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGGR | MMYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.90% | -73.45% | +44.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.13% | -64.83% | +49.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.37% | -69.87% | +46.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -62.50% | +61.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | -36.35% | +28.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.10% | 34.71% | -30.61% |
Volatility
CGGR vs. MMYT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) is 4.17%, while MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) has a volatility of 17.31%. This indicates that CGGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMYT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGGR | MMYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 17.31% | -13.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | 42.22% | -29.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 49.12% | -32.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 49.24% | -27.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 53.39% | -31.62% |
Dividends
CGGR vs. MMYT - Dividend Comparison
CGGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while MMYT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.33% |
MMYT MakeMyTrip Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGGR and MMYT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMYT has higher volatility (17.31%) compared to CGGR (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGGR dropped -28.90% vs MMYT's -73.45%.
CGGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGGR and MMYT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer