CGGO vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
CGGO and VONG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGGO is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Feb 22, 2022. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
CGGO vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CGGO vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF | -1.96% | 21.08% | 14.80% | 23.43% | -13.12% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -8.97% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -17.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGGO achieves a -1.96% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's -8.97% return.
CGGO
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -6.88%
- YTD
- -1.96%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 21.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VONG
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- YTD
- -8.97%
- 6M
- -8.47%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGGO vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGGO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CGGO vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
CGGO
VONG
CGGO vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGGO | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.84 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 1.36 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.22 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.24 | 4.16 | +3.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGGO | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.84 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.84 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between CGGO and VONG is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CGGO vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
CGGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than VONG's 0.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF | 2.07% | 2.03% | 1.10% | 0.76% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
CGGO vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGGO drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, smaller than the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGO and VONG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGGO | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.90% | -32.72% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.15% | -16.23% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.11% | -12.29% | +4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -4.90% | -0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 4.78% | -1.68% |
Volatility
CGGO vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 6.81%. This indicates that CGGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CGGO | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.29% | 6.81% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.87% | 12.37% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.34% | 22.42% | -3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 21.35% | -2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 20.82% | -2.44% |