CGGO vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
CGGO and VONG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGGO is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Feb 22, 2022. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CGGO or VONG.
Key characteristics
| CGGO | VONG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.51% | 32.13% |
| 1Y Return | 30.33% | 45.17% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.06 | 2.62 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.85 | 3.36 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.36 | 1.48 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.89 | 3.35 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.71 | 13.22 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.51% | 3.32% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.24% | 16.76% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.90% | -32.72% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.24% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGGO and VONG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CGGO vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CGGO achieves a 18.51% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 32.13% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGGO vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGGO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.08% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CGGO vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CGGO vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
CGGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than VONG's 0.58% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF | 0.92% | 0.76% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.58% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.43% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
CGGO vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGGO drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, smaller than the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGO and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CGGO vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) is 4.07%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that CGGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.