CGDV vs. JQUA

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) and JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while JQUA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. CGDV is actively managed, while JQUA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGDV returned 24.46%/yr vs 19.66%/yr for JQUA. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGDV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JQUA.

Performance

CGDV vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 12.05% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 12.99% return.

CGDV

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: 12.05%
• 6M: 11.07%
• 1Y: 27.05%
• 3Y*: 24.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JQUA

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 12.99%
• 6M: 11.49%
• 1Y: 21.51%
• 3Y*: 19.66%
• 5Y*: 13.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGDV vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	12.05%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-0.44%
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF	12.99%	11.69%	21.21%	25.13%	-1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CGDV and JQUA is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.91

The correlation between CGDV and JQUA shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CGDV vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGDV	JQUA
Technology	33.1%	43.9%
Industrials	12.9%	8.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	9.2%
Healthcare	10.4%	7.9%
Communication Services	8.3%	6.5%
Financial Services	6.6%	11.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	5.2%
Energy	4.4%	3.4%
Basic Materials	2.8%	1.6%
Real Estate	1.1%	2.1%
Utilities	1.0%	1.2%

Return for Risk

CGDV vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 77
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 80
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 78

JQUA

JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 66
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 59
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDV vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGDV	JQUA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	1.81	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	2.53	+0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.31	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	3.03	-0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.96	12.31	+0.65

CGDV vs. JQUA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the JQUA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDV and JQUA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGDV vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum JQUA drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and JQUA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGDV	JQUA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.82%	-32.92%	+11.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.75%	-7.13%	-2.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.28%	-16.81%	+2.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-1.29%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.58%	-4.14%	+0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	1.75%	+0.34%

Volatility

CGDV vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is 4.65%, while JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that CGDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JQUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGDV	JQUA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	5.30%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.89%	9.48%	+0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.24%	11.98%	+0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.56%	15.74%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.56%	18.00%	-2.44%

CGDV vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGDV vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison

CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than JQUA's 1.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.17%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF	1.10%	1.19%	1.24%	1.21%	1.60%	1.32%	1.44%	1.67%	2.10%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGDV and JQUA in my portfolio?

CGDV and JQUA have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGDV or JQUA?

JQUA has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to CGDV (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs JQUA's -32.92%.

Which ETF is better, CGDV or JQUA?

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.46% vs 19.66% for JQUA. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGDV or JQUA?

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.46% return vs 19.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGDV or JQUA?

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGDV or JQUA?

CGDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 1.10% for JQUA.

What is the main difference between CGDV and JQUA?

CGDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while JQUA is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGDV and 0.12% for JQUA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.