CGDV vs. BLPAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) and BLPAX (American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A) are both funds - CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while BLPAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Funds. Over the past 3 years, CGDV returned 25.65%/yr vs 14.64%/yr for BLPAX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGDV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for BLPAX.

Performance

CGDV vs. BLPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than BLPAX's 7.09% return.

CGDV

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 5.08%
• YTD: 12.65%
• 6M: 13.07%
• 1Y: 31.52%
• 3Y*: 25.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLPAX

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 7.09%
• 6M: 7.64%
• 1Y: 18.42%
• 3Y*: 14.64%
• 5Y*: 7.47%
• 10Y*: 9.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGDV vs. BLPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	12.65%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-2.89%
BLPAX American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A	7.09%	16.64%	11.30%	13.87%	-7.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CGDV and BLPAX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.92

The correlation between CGDV and BLPAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CGDV vs. BLPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 80
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 80

BLPAX

BLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
BLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
BLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
BLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDV vs. BLPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGDV	BLPAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	2.22	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.75	3.14	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.42	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	2.60	+0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.36	11.60	+3.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGDV vs. BLPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the BLPAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDV and BLPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGDV	BLPAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	2.22	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	0.91	+0.34

Drawdowns

CGDV vs. BLPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum BLPAX drawdown of -23.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and BLPAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGDV	BLPAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.82%	-23.21%	+1.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.75%	-7.26%	-2.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.28%	-10.62%	-3.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.65%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.47%	+0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-2.92%	-0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	1.62%	+0.44%

Volatility

CGDV vs. BLPAX - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) at 2.70%. This indicates that CGDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGDV	BLPAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	2.70%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.15%	6.83%	+2.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.58%	8.52%	+3.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.48%	10.41%	+5.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.48%	10.83%	+4.65%

CGDV vs. BLPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than BLPAX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGDV vs. BLPAX - Dividend Comparison

CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than BLPAX's 5.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLPAX American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A	5.44%	5.83%	3.59%	2.30%	6.01%	4.97%	2.56%	3.83%	4.69%	3.48%	3.66%	3.69%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.16%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGDV and BLPAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, CGDV and BLPAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CGDV or BLPAX?

CGDV has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to BLPAX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs BLPAX's -23.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.