CGC vs. IIPR
Compare and contrast key facts about Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR).
Performance
CGC vs. IIPR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CGC vs. IIPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGC Canopy Growth Corporation | -16.74% | -58.39% | -46.38% | -77.88% | -73.54% | -64.57% | 16.83% | -21.51% | 13.58% | 246.87% |
IIPR Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. | 10.03% | -18.40% | -28.55% | 8.78% | -59.02% | 47.49% | 151.33% | 72.52% | 43.88% | 82.30% |
Fundamentals
CGC:
$327.98M
IIPR:
$1.42B
CGC:
-$1.21
IIPR:
$4.14
CGC:
0.87
IIPR:
5.34
CGC:
0.43
IIPR:
0.79
CGC:
$294.24M
IIPR:
$265.96M
CGC:
$71.95M
IIPR:
$235.78M
CGC:
-$225.88M
IIPR:
$205.79M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGC achieves a -16.74% return, which is significantly lower than IIPR's 10.03% return.
CGC
- 1D
- 10.80%
- 1M
- -15.25%
- YTD
- -16.74%
- 6M
- -34.99%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- -62.15%
- 5Y*
- -68.79%
- 10Y*
- -26.31%
IIPR
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 7.31%
- 3Y*
- -3.14%
- 5Y*
- -16.29%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGC vs. IIPR — Risk / Return Rank
CGC
IIPR
CGC vs. IIPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGC | IIPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.04 | 0.18 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 0.56 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.07 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | -0.29 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | -0.70 | +0.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGC | IIPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 | 0.18 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.56 | -0.40 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | 0.37 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between CGC and IIPR is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CGC vs. IIPR - Dividend Comparison
CGC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IIPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.15%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGC Canopy Growth Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IIPR Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. | 15.15% | 16.05% | 11.28% | 7.16% | 7.01% | 2.18% | 2.44% | 3.73% | 1.87% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
CGC vs. IIPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGC drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than IIPR's maximum drawdown of -78.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGC and IIPR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGC | IIPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -78.42% | -21.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.61% | -21.29% | -34.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.74% | -78.42% | -21.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.83% | -73.58% | -26.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.53% | -36.35% | -25.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.86% | 8.73% | +25.13% |
Volatility
CGC vs. IIPR - Volatility Comparison
Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) has a higher volatility of 17.62% compared to Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) at 9.37%. This indicates that CGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IIPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CGC | IIPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.62% | 9.37% | +8.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.50% | 28.46% | +40.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 117.39% | 42.31% | +75.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 123.85% | 41.17% | +82.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.96% | 48.45% | +54.51% |
Financials
CGC vs. IIPR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canopy Growth Corporation and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CGC vs. IIPR - Profitability Comparison
CGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canopy Growth Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.47M and revenue of 90.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.8%.
IIPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.68M and revenue of 66.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.0%.
CGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canopy Growth Corporation reported an operating income of -26.35M and revenue of 90.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -29.2%.
IIPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 31.85M and revenue of 66.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.8%.
CGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canopy Growth Corporation reported a net income of -62.63M and revenue of 90.39M, resulting in a net margin of -69.3%.
IIPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 30.71M and revenue of 66.66M, resulting in a net margin of 46.1%.