CGC vs. AAPL

In the year-to-date period, CGC achieves a -44.62% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 32.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CGC has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of -16.86%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 26.14% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGC and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CGC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.

The maximum CGC drawdown since its inception was -99.52%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGC and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) has a higher volatility of 17.33% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 4.04%. This indicates that CGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canopy Growth Corporation and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.