CGBL vs. YYY

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CGBL (Capital Group Core Balanced ETF) and YYY (Amplify CEF High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGBL is a Allocation--50% to 70% Equity fund actively managed by Capital Group, while YYY is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Nasdaq CEF High Income™ Index. CGBL is actively managed, while YYY is passively managed. Over the past year, CGBL returned 16.28% vs 11.19% for YYY. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGBL charges 0.33%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for YYY.

Performance

CGBL vs. YYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) and Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGBL achieves a 7.02% return, which is significantly higher than YYY's 5.38% return.

CGBL

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 7.02%
• 6M: 6.23%
• 1Y: 16.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YYY

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 5.38%
• 6M: 4.52%
• 1Y: 11.19%
• 3Y*: 12.57%
• 5Y*: 3.12%
• 10Y*: 5.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGBL vs. YYY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF	7.02%	15.33%	16.64%	10.10%
YYY Amplify CEF High Income ETF	5.38%	13.08%	11.86%	8.41%

Correlation

The correlation between CGBL and YYY is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.71

The correlation between CGBL and YYY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CGBL vs. YYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGBL

CGBL Risk / Return Rank: 54
CGBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CGBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CGBL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CGBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
CGBL Martin Ratio Rank: 58

YYY

YYY Risk / Return Rank: 40
YYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
YYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
YYY Omega Ratio Rank: 43
YYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
YYY Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGBL vs. YYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) and Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGBL	YYY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.30	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	1.86	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.25	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	1.39	+0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.01	5.99	+3.01

CGBL vs. YYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the YYY Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGBL and YYY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGBL vs. YYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGBL drawdown since its inception was -11.66%, smaller than the maximum YYY drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBL and YYY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGBL	YYY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.66%	-42.52%	+30.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.88%	-8.07%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.47%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.92%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-0.43%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-6.81%	+5.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	1.87%	-0.06%

Volatility

CGBL vs. YYY - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY) at 2.58%. This indicates that CGBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGBL	YYY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	2.58%	+1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.51%	7.19%	+1.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.19%	8.67%	+1.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.15%	11.37%	-0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.15%	13.89%	-2.74%

CGBL vs. YYY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGBL has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than YYY's 3.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGBL vs. YYY - Dividend Comparison

CGBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than YYY's 12.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF	1.86%	1.98%	1.92%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
YYY Amplify CEF High Income ETF	12.51%	12.51%	12.50%	12.39%	12.36%	9.08%	9.79%	9.10%	9.73%	8.16%	10.34%	10.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGBL and YYY in my portfolio?

CGBL and YYY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGBL or YYY?

CGBL has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to YYY (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGBL dropped -11.66% vs YYY's -42.52%.

Which ETF is better, CGBL or YYY?

On 1-year performance, CGBL leads with 16.28% vs 11.19% for YYY. On fees, CGBL is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, YYY has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGBL or YYY?

Over the 1-year period, CGBL has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGBL or YYY?

CGBL is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 3.23% for YYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGBL or YYY?

YYY has the higher dividend yield at 12.51%, compared with 1.86% for CGBL.

What is the main difference between CGBL and YYY?

CGBL is categorized as Allocation--50% to 70% Equity, while YYY is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGBL and 3.23% for YYY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.