PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGBL vs. SCHA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGBL vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.05%
17.03%
CGBL
SCHA

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGBL achieves a 17.18% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 19.43% return.


CGBL

YTD

17.18%

1M

0.99%

6M

9.06%

1Y

23.77%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

SCHA

YTD

19.43%

1M

8.87%

6M

17.03%

1Y

34.96%

5Y (annualized)

11.02%

10Y (annualized)

9.64%

Key characteristics


CGBLSCHA
Sharpe Ratio2.541.80
Sortino Ratio3.532.54
Omega Ratio1.471.31
Calmar Ratio4.021.67
Martin Ratio16.6610.21
Ulcer Index1.43%3.42%
Daily Std Dev9.39%19.45%
Max Drawdown-5.93%-42.41%
Current Drawdown-1.16%-0.64%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGBL vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGBL has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.


CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Expense ratio chart for CGBL: current value at 0.33% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.33%
Expense ratio chart for SCHA: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between CGBL and SCHA is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGBL vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGBL, currently valued at 2.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.541.80
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGBL, currently valued at 3.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.532.54
The chart of Omega ratio for CGBL, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.471.31
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGBL, currently valued at 4.02, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.023.83
The chart of Martin ratio for CGBL, currently valued at 16.66, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0016.6610.21
CGBL
SCHA

The current CGBL Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGBL and SCHA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10Nov 17
2.54
1.80
CGBL
SCHA

Dividends

CGBL vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

CGBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than SCHA's 1.21% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
1.67%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1.21%1.74%1.74%2.17%1.65%1.39%2.91%2.01%2.62%1.93%1.83%2.28%

Drawdowns

CGBL vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGBL drawdown since its inception was -5.93%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBL and SCHA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.16%
-0.64%
CGBL
SCHA

Volatility

CGBL vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) is 2.81%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.92%. This indicates that CGBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.81%
6.92%
CGBL
SCHA