PortfoliosLab logo
CGBD vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CGBD and VOO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

CGBD vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
71.07%
146.99%
CGBD
VOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CGBD:

-0.26

VOO:

0.32

Sortino Ratio

CGBD:

-0.20

VOO:

0.57

Omega Ratio

CGBD:

0.97

VOO:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

CGBD:

-0.23

VOO:

0.32

Martin Ratio

CGBD:

-0.87

VOO:

1.42

Ulcer Index

CGBD:

6.70%

VOO:

4.19%

Daily Std Dev

CGBD:

22.33%

VOO:

18.73%

Max Drawdown

CGBD:

-71.62%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

CGBD:

-19.27%

VOO:

-13.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGBD achieves a -16.43% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -9.88% return.


CGBD

YTD

-16.43%

1M

-11.96%

6M

-15.35%

1Y

-6.28%

5Y*

28.67%

10Y*

N/A

VOO

YTD

-9.88%

1M

-5.88%

6M

-9.00%

1Y

6.61%

5Y*

14.69%

10Y*

11.64%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGBD vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGBD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGBD is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGBD is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGBD is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGBD is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGBD is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGBD is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CGBD vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGBD, currently valued at -0.26, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
CGBD: -0.26
VOO: 0.32
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGBD, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
CGBD: -0.20
VOO: 0.57
The chart of Omega ratio for CGBD, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CGBD: 0.97
VOO: 1.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGBD, currently valued at -0.23, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
CGBD: -0.23
VOO: 0.32
The chart of Martin ratio for CGBD, currently valued at -0.87, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
CGBD: -0.87
VOO: 1.42

The current CGBD Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGBD and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.26
0.32
CGBD
VOO

Dividends

CGBD vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CGBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than VOO's 1.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CGBD
TCG BDC, Inc.
6.65%5.13%5.88%7.97%7.36%14.33%11.06%13.55%6.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.44%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

CGBD vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGBD drawdown since its inception was -71.62%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBD and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-19.27%
-13.85%
CGBD
VOO

Volatility

CGBD vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) has a higher volatility of 14.41% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 13.31%. This indicates that CGBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.41%
13.31%
CGBD
VOO