PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGBD vs. MSFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CGBD and MSFT is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

CGBD vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
157.45%
589.14%
CGBD
MSFT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CGBD:

1.83

MSFT:

0.60

Sortino Ratio

CGBD:

2.43

MSFT:

0.91

Omega Ratio

CGBD:

1.33

MSFT:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

CGBD:

2.57

MSFT:

0.78

Martin Ratio

CGBD:

7.24

MSFT:

1.70

Ulcer Index

CGBD:

4.33%

MSFT:

7.14%

Daily Std Dev

CGBD:

17.18%

MSFT:

20.43%

Max Drawdown

CGBD:

-71.09%

MSFT:

-69.39%

Current Drawdown

CGBD:

-0.81%

MSFT:

-4.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CGBD:

$932.09M

MSFT:

$3.30T

EPS

CGBD:

$1.73

MSFT:

$12.12

PE Ratio

CGBD:

10.58

MSFT:

36.64

PEG Ratio

CGBD:

3.54

MSFT:

2.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

CGBD:

$149.77M

MSFT:

$192.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CGBD:

$123.45M

MSFT:

$133.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

CGBD:

$122.67M

MSFT:

$106.15B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGBD achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's 5.35% return.


CGBD

YTD

2.12%

1M

3.37%

6M

5.41%

1Y

30.68%

5Y*

19.82%

10Y*

N/A

MSFT

YTD

5.35%

1M

1.36%

6M

4.82%

1Y

10.76%

5Y*

23.48%

10Y*

28.88%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGBD vs. MSFT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGBD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGBD is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGBD is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGBD is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGBD is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGBD is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGBD is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSFT is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSFT is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSFT is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSFT is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CGBD vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGBD, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.830.60
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGBD, currently valued at 2.43, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.430.91
The chart of Omega ratio for CGBD, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.331.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGBD, currently valued at 2.57, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.570.78
The chart of Martin ratio for CGBD, currently valued at 7.24, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.241.70
CGBD
MSFT

The current CGBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGBD and MSFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.83
0.60
CGBD
MSFT

Dividends

CGBD vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

CGBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.21%, more than MSFT's 0.69% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CGBD
TCG BDC, Inc.
10.21%10.43%11.76%11.46%10.92%14.33%13.00%13.55%6.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.69%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%2.48%

Drawdowns

CGBD vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGBD drawdown since its inception was -71.09%, roughly equal to the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGBD and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.81%
-4.66%
CGBD
MSFT

Volatility

CGBD vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCG BDC, Inc. (CGBD) is 4.21%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that CGBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.21%
6.29%
CGBD
MSFT

Financials

CGBD vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TCG BDC, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab