CGA vs. ICL

In the year-to-date period, CGA achieves a -39.60% return, which is significantly lower than ICL's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CGA has underperformed ICL with an annualized return of -21.15%, while ICL has yielded a comparatively higher 1.34% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Green Agriculture, Inc. (CGA) and ICL Group Ltd (ICL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CGA Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the ICL Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGA and ICL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CGA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%.

The maximum CGA drawdown since its inception was -99.53%, which is greater than ICL's maximum drawdown of -63.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGA and ICL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

China Green Agriculture, Inc. (CGA) has a higher volatility of 11.45% compared to ICL Group Ltd (ICL) at 10.67%. This indicates that CGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Green Agriculture, Inc. and ICL Group Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.