PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGA vs. ICL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CGA and ICL is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

CGA vs. ICL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Green Agriculture, Inc. (CGA) and ICL Group Ltd (ICL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-19.00%
29.95%
CGA
ICL

Key characteristics

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CGA:

$29.00M

ICL:

$7.63B

EPS

CGA:

-$2.15

ICL:

$0.32

PEG Ratio

CGA:

0.00

ICL:

9.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

CGA:

$73.01M

ICL:

$5.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CGA:

$15.73M

ICL:

$1.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

CGA:

-$11.19M

ICL:

$1.08B

Returns By Period


CGA

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ICL

YTD

19.64%

1M

20.86%

6M

29.94%

1Y

37.96%

5Y*

17.97%

10Y*

6.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGA vs. ICL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGA is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGA is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGA is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGA is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGA is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGA is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

ICL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ICL is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ICL is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ICL is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ICL is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ICL is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ICL is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CGA vs. ICL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Green Agriculture, Inc. (CGA) and ICL Group Ltd (ICL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGA, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.161.25
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGA, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.461.89
The chart of Omega ratio for CGA, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.061.22
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGA, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.160.75
The chart of Martin ratio for CGA, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.462.89
CGA
ICL


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.16
1.25
CGA
ICL

Dividends

CGA vs. ICL - Dividend Comparison

CGA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CGA
China Green Agriculture, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.58%
ICL
ICL Group Ltd
4.13%4.94%18.22%24.74%7.14%3.65%8.89%6.64%5.79%4.92%10.84%2.72%

Drawdowns

CGA vs. ICL - Drawdown Comparison


-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-93.54%
-32.80%
CGA
ICL

Volatility

CGA vs. ICL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for China Green Agriculture, Inc. (CGA) is 0.00%, while ICL Group Ltd (ICL) has a volatility of 9.47%. This indicates that CGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember20250
9.47%
CGA
ICL

Financials

CGA vs. ICL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Green Agriculture, Inc. and ICL Group Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab