PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CFLT vs. ZS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CFLTZS
YTD Return31.07%-20.19%
1Y Return27.63%46.36%
Sharpe Ratio0.451.28
Daily Std Dev75.67%42.75%
Max Drawdown-82.61%-76.41%
Current Drawdown-67.23%-52.05%

Fundamentals


CFLTZS
Market Cap$9.35B$26.17B
EPS-$1.25-$0.94
Revenue (TTM)$819.89M$1.90B
Gross Profit (TTM)$384.70M$1.26B
EBITDA (TTM)-$383.96M-$153.45M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between CFLT and ZS is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CFLT vs. ZS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CFLT achieves a 31.07% return, which is significantly higher than ZS's -20.19% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-31.87%
-19.50%
CFLT
ZS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Confluent, Inc.

Zscaler, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CFLT vs. ZS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Confluent, Inc. (CFLT) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFLT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CFLT, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CFLT, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CFLT, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CFLT, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.42
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CFLT, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.23
ZS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ZS, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.28
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ZS, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.72
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ZS, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ZS, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.80
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ZS, currently valued at 4.04, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.004.04

CFLT vs. ZS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the ZS Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CFLT and ZS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.45
1.28
CFLT
ZS

Dividends

CFLT vs. ZS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CFLT nor ZS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CFLT vs. ZS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFLT drawdown since its inception was -82.61%, which is greater than ZS's maximum drawdown of -76.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFLT and ZS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-67.23%
-52.05%
CFLT
ZS

Volatility

CFLT vs. ZS - Volatility Comparison

Confluent, Inc. (CFLT) has a higher volatility of 16.26% compared to Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) at 7.76%. This indicates that CFLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
16.26%
7.76%
CFLT
ZS

Financials

CFLT vs. ZS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Confluent, Inc. and Zscaler, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items