CFLT vs. ZS
Compare and contrast key facts about Confluent, Inc. (CFLT) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CFLT or ZS.
Key characteristics
| CFLT | ZS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 21.92% | -5.89% |
| 1Y Return | 43.29% | 12.97% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -29.15% | -15.56% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.72 | 0.27 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.59 | 0.61 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.20 | 1.09 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.56 | 0.20 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.87 | 0.48 |
| Ulcer Index | 24.07% | 23.99% |
| Daily Std Dev | 62.08% | 41.82% |
| Max Drawdown | -82.61% | -76.41% |
| Current Drawdown | -69.52% | -43.46% |
Fundamentals
| CFLT | ZS | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.09B | $30.43B |
| EPS | -$1.10 | -$0.40 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.62 | 1.18 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $915.61M | $1.67B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $668.69M | $1.31B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -$382.02M | -$14.51M |
Correlation
The correlation between CFLT and ZS is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CFLT vs. ZS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CFLT achieves a 21.92% return, which is significantly higher than ZS's -5.89% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CFLT vs. ZS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Confluent, Inc. (CFLT) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CFLT vs. ZS - Dividend Comparison
Neither CFLT nor ZS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CFLT vs. ZS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFLT drawdown since its inception was -82.61%, which is greater than ZS's maximum drawdown of -76.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFLT and ZS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CFLT vs. ZS - Volatility Comparison
Confluent, Inc. (CFLT) has a higher volatility of 15.39% compared to Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) at 8.73%. This indicates that CFLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CFLT vs. ZS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Confluent, Inc. and Zscaler, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities