PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CFG vs. BAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CFGBAC
YTD Return46.90%39.02%
1Y Return78.20%59.29%
3Y Return (Ann)2.33%1.80%
5Y Return (Ann)9.14%9.58%
10Y Return (Ann)10.66%12.71%
Sharpe Ratio2.542.61
Sortino Ratio3.523.84
Omega Ratio1.441.47
Calmar Ratio1.711.64
Martin Ratio17.0611.22
Ulcer Index4.88%5.48%
Daily Std Dev32.77%23.53%
Max Drawdown-65.60%-93.45%
Current Drawdown-5.03%-0.39%

Fundamentals


CFGBAC
Market Cap$20.48B$351.88B
EPS$2.55$2.76
PE Ratio18.2316.62
PEG Ratio0.262.06
Total Revenue (TTM)$11.37B$95.85B
Gross Profit (TTM)$11.31B$94.17B
EBITDA (TTM)$688.00M$18.44B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between CFG and BAC is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CFG vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CFG achieves a 46.90% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's 39.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CFG has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 10.66%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.71% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
27.85%
18.30%
CFG
BAC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CFG vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CFG, currently valued at 2.54, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.54
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CFG, currently valued at 3.52, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.52
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CFG, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.44
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CFG, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.71
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CFG, currently valued at 17.06, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0017.06
BAC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAC, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAC, currently valued at 3.84, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.84
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.64
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BAC, currently valued at 11.22, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.22

CFG vs. BAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFG Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFG and BAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.54
2.61
CFG
BAC

Dividends

CFG vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

CFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than BAC's 2.14% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CFG
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
3.61%5.07%4.11%3.30%4.36%3.35%3.30%1.52%1.29%1.53%0.40%0.00%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.14%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%0.26%

Drawdowns

CFG vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFG drawdown since its inception was -65.60%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFG and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.03%
-0.39%
CFG
BAC

Volatility

CFG vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) has a higher volatility of 15.77% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 9.49%. This indicates that CFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.77%
9.49%
CFG
BAC

Financials

CFG vs. BAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Citizens Financial Group, Inc. and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items