PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CEY.L vs. HOC.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CEY.LHOC.L
YTD Return44.94%86.74%
1Y Return63.19%89.39%
3Y Return (Ann)16.35%7.31%
5Y Return (Ann)10.57%3.68%
10Y Return (Ann)17.94%10.94%
Sharpe Ratio1.681.95
Sortino Ratio2.802.58
Omega Ratio1.351.31
Calmar Ratio1.191.08
Martin Ratio9.539.55
Ulcer Index6.46%9.38%
Daily Std Dev36.40%45.80%
Max Drawdown-85.95%-93.29%
Current Drawdown-21.39%-60.02%

Fundamentals


CEY.LHOC.L
Market Cap£1.69B£1.14B
EPS£0.06£0.05
PE Ratio23.5342.90
PEG Ratio-0.280.00
Total Revenue (TTM)£697.92M£771.43M
Gross Profit (TTM)£232.55M£265.47M
EBITDA (TTM)£316.25M£304.63M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CEY.L and HOC.L is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CEY.L vs. HOC.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CEY.L achieves a 44.94% return, which is significantly lower than HOC.L's 86.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CEY.L has outperformed HOC.L with an annualized return of 17.94%, while HOC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.94% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.56%
25.74%
CEY.L
HOC.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CEY.L vs. HOC.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centamin plc (CEY.L) and Hochschild Mining plc (HOC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEY.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CEY.L, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.69
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CEY.L, currently valued at 2.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.70
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CEY.L, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CEY.L, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.20
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CEY.L, currently valued at 9.68, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.68
HOC.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HOC.L, currently valued at 1.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.96
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HOC.L, currently valued at 2.54, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.55
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HOC.L, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HOC.L, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.08
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HOC.L, currently valued at 9.80, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.80

CEY.L vs. HOC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the HOC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEY.L and HOC.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.69
1.96
CEY.L
HOC.L

Dividends

CEY.L vs. HOC.L - Dividend Comparison

CEY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, while HOC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CEY.L
Centamin plc
3.04%4.51%6.64%7.88%9.70%5.51%11.49%10.42%2.09%4.07%0.90%0.00%
HOC.L
Hochschild Mining plc
0.00%0.00%6.05%3.30%3.05%2.16%2.52%0.90%0.50%0.00%0.00%1.37%

Drawdowns

CEY.L vs. HOC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEY.L drawdown since its inception was -85.95%, smaller than the maximum HOC.L drawdown of -93.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEY.L and HOC.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-24.08%
-68.74%
CEY.L
HOC.L

Volatility

CEY.L vs. HOC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Centamin plc (CEY.L) is 12.04%, while Hochschild Mining plc (HOC.L) has a volatility of 15.00%. This indicates that CEY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.04%
15.00%
CEY.L
HOC.L

Financials

CEY.L vs. HOC.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Centamin plc and Hochschild Mining plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in GBp except per share items