PortfoliosLab logo
CETF vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CETF and QQQ is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CETF vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DriveWealth NYSE 100 Index ETF (CETF) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


CETF

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QQQ

YTD

1.69%

1M

9.18%

6M

2.15%

1Y

15.66%

3Y*

19.78%

5Y*

18.08%

10Y*

17.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DriveWealth NYSE 100 Index ETF

Invesco QQQ

CETF vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CETF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CETF vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CETF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CETF is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CETF is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CETF is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CETF is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CETF is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CETF is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CETF vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DriveWealth NYSE 100 Index ETF (CETF) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CETF vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

CETF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CETF
DriveWealth NYSE 100 Index ETF
3.33%3.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.58%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

CETF vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CETF vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...