PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CET vs. RVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CET vs. RVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Central Securities Corp. (CET) and Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CET achieves a 3.92% return, which is significantly lower than RVT's 15.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CET has outperformed RVT with an annualized return of 16.27%, while RVT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.06% annualized return.


CET

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
3.92%
6M
4.79%
1Y
19.19%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*
16.27%

RVT

1D
-1.52%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
15.05%
6M
16.68%
1Y
33.00%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
13.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CET vs. RVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CET
Central Securities Corp.
3.92%17.20%26.82%19.17%-19.68%49.00%4.99%38.61%-4.49%30.61%
RVT
Royce Value Trust Inc.
15.05%11.54%17.93%18.79%-26.25%32.66%18.16%35.41%-20.70%30.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CET and RVT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 1992

0.53

The correlation between CET and RVT shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CET:

$1.53B

RVT:

$2.19B

EPS

CET:

$19.09

RVT:

$4.02

PE Ratio

CET:

2.76

RVT:

4.53

PS Ratio

CET:

9.50

RVT:

12.83

PB Ratio

CET:

0.86

RVT:

1.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

CET:

$160.68M

RVT:

$170.31M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CET:

$103.20M

RVT:

$304.06M

EBITDA (TTM)

CET:

$553.54M

RVT:

$439.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CET vs. RVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CET
CET Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CET Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CET Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CET Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CET Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

RVT
RVT Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CET vs. RVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Central Securities Corp. (CET) and Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CETRVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.72

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.87

9.84

+0.03

CET vs. RVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CET Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the RVT Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CET and RVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CETRVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.86

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.34

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.57

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.42

+0.18

Drawdowns

CET vs. RVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CET drawdown since its inception was -56.69%, smaller than the maximum RVT drawdown of -72.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CET and RVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CETRVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.69%

-72.34%

+15.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

-12.19%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-23.48%

+8.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.89%

-32.79%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.91%

-47.18%

+7.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-2.99%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.16%

-11.30%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

3.36%

-1.41%

Volatility

CET vs. RVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Central Securities Corp. (CET) is 3.03%, while Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that CET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CETRVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

5.32%

-2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

13.42%

-4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

17.87%

-6.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.50%

22.42%

-7.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

22.96%

-6.33%

Dividends

CET vs. RVT - Dividend Comparison

CET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, less than RVT's 7.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CET
Central Securities Corp.
5.12%5.32%4.92%4.90%7.34%8.41%5.68%3.78%5.84%3.65%4.50%10.41%
RVT
Royce Value Trust Inc.
7.80%8.82%8.04%7.35%9.95%8.52%6.44%7.45%10.68%7.17%7.62%10.54%

Financials

CET vs. RVT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Central Securities Corp. and Royce Value Trust Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20212022202320242025
38.05M
132.59M
(CET) Total Revenue
(RVT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CET and RVT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RVT has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to CET (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CET dropped -56.69% vs RVT's -72.34%.

RVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CET and RVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer