PortfoliosLab logo
CET vs. RVT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CET and RVT is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CET vs. RVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Central Securities Corp. (CET) and Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CET:

0.98

RVT:

0.24

Sortino Ratio

CET:

1.47

RVT:

0.55

Omega Ratio

CET:

1.21

RVT:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

CET:

0.96

RVT:

0.27

Martin Ratio

CET:

3.56

RVT:

0.85

Ulcer Index

CET:

4.15%

RVT:

7.35%

Daily Std Dev

CET:

14.62%

RVT:

23.31%

Max Drawdown

CET:

-56.65%

RVT:

-72.33%

Current Drawdown

CET:

-5.81%

RVT:

-11.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CET:

$1.30B

RVT:

$1.68B

EPS

CET:

$10.15

RVT:

$1.35

PE Ratio

CET:

4.43

RVT:

10.57

PEG Ratio

CET:

0.00

RVT:

0.00

PS Ratio

CET:

54.75

RVT:

71.22

PB Ratio

CET:

0.83

RVT:

0.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

CET:

$73.73M

RVT:

$189.34M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CET:

$68.23M

RVT:

$167.48M

EBITDA (TTM)

CET:

$288.14M

RVT:

$221.95M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CET achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly higher than RVT's -6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CET has outperformed RVT with an annualized return of 12.73%, while RVT has yielded a comparatively lower 8.83% annualized return.


CET

YTD

-0.70%

1M

4.90%

6M

-3.55%

1Y

14.29%

5Y*

16.16%

10Y*

12.73%

RVT

YTD

-6.74%

1M

5.71%

6M

-8.50%

1Y

5.58%

5Y*

13.49%

10Y*

8.83%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CET vs. RVT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CET is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CET is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CET is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CET is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CET is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CET is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

RVT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RVT is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RVT is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RVT is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RVT is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RVT is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RVT is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CET vs. RVT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Central Securities Corp. (CET) and Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CET Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the RVT Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CET and RVT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CET vs. RVT - Dividend Comparison

CET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, less than RVT's 9.01% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CET
Central Securities Corp.
5.08%5.04%4.90%8.83%8.41%2.60%1.72%5.84%3.65%4.50%1.52%7.97%
RVT
Royce Value Trust Inc.
9.01%8.04%7.35%9.95%8.52%6.44%7.45%10.68%7.17%7.62%10.54%12.70%

Drawdowns

CET vs. RVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CET drawdown since its inception was -56.65%, smaller than the maximum RVT drawdown of -72.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CET and RVT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CET vs. RVT - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

CET vs. RVT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Central Securities Corp. and Royce Value Trust Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
31.26M
91.86M
(CET) Total Revenue
(RVT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items