PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CER.L vs. WM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CER.LWM
YTD Return16.51%26.88%
1Y Return54.05%32.90%
3Y Return (Ann)30.05%13.16%
5Y Return (Ann)60.04%16.95%
Sharpe Ratio1.591.85
Sortino Ratio2.202.40
Omega Ratio1.291.40
Calmar Ratio3.002.77
Martin Ratio8.388.00
Ulcer Index5.72%4.10%
Daily Std Dev30.25%17.79%
Max Drawdown-34.57%-77.85%
Current Drawdown-4.36%0.00%

Fundamentals


CER.LWM
Market Cap£552.31M$90.22B
EPS£0.47$6.54
PE Ratio39.6834.37
Total Revenue (TTM)£22.52M$21.39B
Gross Profit (TTM)£17.01M$7.35B
EBITDA (TTM)£11.12M$6.17B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between CER.L and WM is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CER.L vs. WM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CER.L achieves a 16.51% return, which is significantly lower than WM's 26.88% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
22.93%
7.90%
CER.L
WM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CER.L vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cerillion plc (CER.L) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CER.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CER.L, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CER.L, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CER.L, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CER.L, currently valued at 3.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CER.L, currently valued at 7.93, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.93
WM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WM, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.87
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for WM, currently valued at 2.43, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.43
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for WM, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for WM, currently valued at 2.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.81
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for WM, currently valued at 8.08, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.08

CER.L vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CER.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the WM Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CER.L and WM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.60
1.87
CER.L
WM

Dividends

CER.L vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

CER.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than WM's 1.31% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CER.L
Cerillion plc
0.64%0.70%0.75%0.80%2.12%1.92%3.15%2.73%2.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.31%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%2.92%3.25%

Drawdowns

CER.L vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CER.L drawdown since its inception was -34.57%, smaller than the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CER.L and WM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.04%
0
CER.L
WM

Volatility

CER.L vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

Cerillion plc (CER.L) has a higher volatility of 12.67% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 6.42%. This indicates that CER.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.67%
6.42%
CER.L
WM

Financials

CER.L vs. WM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cerillion plc and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. CER.L values in GBp, WM values in USD