PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CER.L vs. ATLCY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CER.L vs. ATLCY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Cerillion plc (CER.L) and Atlas Copco ADR (ATLCY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CER.L is traded in GBp, while ATLCY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ATLCY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CER.L achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than ATLCY's 10.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CER.L has outperformed ATLCY with an annualized return of 29.15%, while ATLCY has yielded a comparatively lower 15.55% annualized return.


CER.L

1D
-3.44%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
4.43%
6M
-1.24%
1Y
-33.65%
3Y*
-2.35%
5Y*
9.63%
10Y*
29.15%

ATLCY

1D
-0.58%
1M
3.80%
YTD
10.24%
6M
8.43%
1Y
25.04%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CER.L vs. ATLCY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CER.L
Cerillion plc
4.43%-29.70%10.46%33.65%37.13%116.30%78.05%81.73%-4.14%8.93%
ATLCY
Atlas Copco ADR
10.24%13.64%-6.60%35.62%-16.65%35.79%29.82%55.98%-36.80%32.45%

Correlation

The correlation between CER.L and ATLCY is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2016

0.08

The correlation between CER.L and ATLCY shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CER.L:

£373.77M

ATLCY:

$84.23B

EPS

CER.L:

£0.94

ATLCY:

$5.38

PE Ratio

CER.L:

13.39

ATLCY:

3.21

PEG Ratio

CER.L:

0.49

ATLCY:

0.29

PS Ratio

CER.L:

4.42

ATLCY:

0.53

PB Ratio

CER.L:

6.17

ATLCY:

0.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

CER.L:

£84.61M

ATLCY:

$157.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CER.L:

£62.92M

ATLCY:

$67.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

CER.L:

£40.90M

ATLCY:

$41.05B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CER.L vs. ATLCY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CER.L
CER.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CER.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CER.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CER.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CER.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CER.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ATLCY
ATLCY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ATLCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATLCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATLCY Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ATLCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATLCY Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CER.L vs. ATLCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cerillion plc (CER.L) and Atlas Copco ADR (ATLCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CER.LATLCYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.16

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

1.23

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.29

3.70

-4.99

CER.L vs. ATLCY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CER.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the ATLCY Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CER.L and ATLCY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CER.LATLCYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

0.85

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.31

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.46

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.32

+0.62

Drawdowns

CER.L vs. ATLCY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CER.L drawdown since its inception was -47.28%, smaller than the maximum ATLCY drawdown of -65.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CER.L and ATLCY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CER.LATLCYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.28%

-65.02%

+17.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.01%

-20.39%

-26.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.28%

-28.60%

-18.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.28%

-37.78%

-9.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.28%

-55.44%

+8.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.65%

-6.22%

-27.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.55%

-15.29%

+4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.89%

6.78%

+19.11%

Volatility

CER.L vs. ATLCY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cerillion plc (CER.L) is 9.65%, while Atlas Copco ADR (ATLCY) has a volatility of 10.28%. This indicates that CER.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATLCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CER.LATLCYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.65%

10.28%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.83%

22.98%

+9.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.72%

29.49%

+16.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.12%

31.53%

+7.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.66%

33.75%

+2.91%

Dividends

CER.L vs. ATLCY - Dividend Comparison

CER.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than ATLCY's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATLCY
Atlas Copco ADR
2.54%1.97%2.96%1.45%3.55%1.45%2.51%1.96%8.11%3.00%6.68%3.08%
CER.L
Cerillion plc
0.84%1.15%1.28%0.70%0.75%0.80%2.12%1.92%3.15%2.73%2.82%0.00%

Financials

CER.L vs. ATLCY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cerillion plc and Atlas Copco ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
18.01M
42.02B
(CER.L) Total Revenue
(ATLCY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CER.L values in GBp, ATLCY values in USD

CER.L vs. ATLCY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cerillion plc and Atlas Copco ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
68.6%
42.2%
Portfolio components
CER.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cerillion plc reported a gross profit of 12.35M and revenue of 18.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.6%.

ATLCY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atlas Copco ADR reported a gross profit of 17.74B and revenue of 42.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.2%.

CER.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cerillion plc reported an operating income of 4.86M and revenue of 18.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.0%.

ATLCY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atlas Copco ADR reported an operating income of 8.33B and revenue of 42.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.

CER.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cerillion plc reported a net income of 4.11M and revenue of 18.01M, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.

ATLCY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atlas Copco ADR reported a net income of 6.49B and revenue of 42.02B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CER.L and ATLCY have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CER.L and ATLCY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer