CEMR.DE vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
CEMR.DE and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEMR.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe Momentum. It was launched on Jan 16, 2015. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both CEMR.DE and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CEMR.DE or VOO.
Key characteristics
| CEMR.DE | VOO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 21.31% | 27.26% |
| 1Y Return | 29.41% | 37.86% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.58% | 10.35% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.06% | 16.03% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.12 | 3.25 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.80 | 4.31 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.38 | 1.61 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.54 | 4.74 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.18 | 21.63 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.17% | 1.85% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.44% | 12.25% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.78% | -33.99% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMR.DE and VOO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CEMR.DE vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CEMR.DE achieves a 21.31% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 27.26% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEMR.DE vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMR.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CEMR.DE vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CEMR.DE vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
CEMR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMR.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.23% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
CEMR.DE vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMR.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.78%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMR.DE and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CEMR.DE vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.92%. This indicates that CEMR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.