CEMR.DE vs. IWFM.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L).
CEMR.DE and IWFM.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEMR.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe Momentum. It was launched on Jan 16, 2015. IWFM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Growth NR USD. It was launched on Oct 3, 2014. Both CEMR.DE and IWFM.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CEMR.DE or IWFM.L.
Key characteristics
CEMR.DE | IWFM.L | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 21.31% | 31.42% |
1Y Return | 29.41% | 36.77% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 4.58% | 7.51% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 10.06% | 13.19% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.12 | 2.24 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.80 | 2.94 |
Omega Ratio | 1.38 | 1.43 |
Calmar Ratio | 2.54 | 2.80 |
Martin Ratio | 12.18 | 10.51 |
Ulcer Index | 2.17% | 3.41% |
Daily Std Dev | 12.44% | 15.94% |
Max Drawdown | -31.78% | -22.58% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMR.DE and IWFM.L is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CEMR.DE vs. IWFM.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CEMR.DE achieves a 21.31% return, which is significantly lower than IWFM.L's 31.42% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEMR.DE vs. IWFM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMR.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IWFM.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CEMR.DE vs. IWFM.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CEMR.DE vs. IWFM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMR.DE nor IWFM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CEMR.DE vs. IWFM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMR.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.78%, which is greater than IWFM.L's maximum drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMR.DE and IWFM.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CEMR.DE vs. IWFM.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWFM.L) at 2.67%. This indicates that CEMR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWFM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.