PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CELU vs. XBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CELU vs. XBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celularity Inc. (CELU) and SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CELU vs. XBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CELU
Celularity Inc.
18.02%-46.63%-15.93%-80.82%-74.80%-53.45%10.55%1.53%
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
5.43%35.89%1.01%7.60%-25.87%-20.45%48.33%12.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CELU achieves a 18.02% return, which is significantly higher than XBI's 5.43% return.


CELU

1D
-1.50%
1M
9.17%
YTD
18.02%
6M
-35.78%
1Y
-23.84%
3Y*
-40.43%
5Y*
-58.06%
10Y*

XBI

1D
0.64%
1M
1.58%
YTD
5.43%
6M
27.21%
1Y
65.07%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
-1.16%
10Y*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CELU vs. XBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CELU
CELU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CELU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CELU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CELU Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CELU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CELU Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

XBI
XBI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
XBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CELU vs. XBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celularity Inc. (CELU) and SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CELUXBIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.23

2.28

-2.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.42

2.99

-2.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.38

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

4.41

-4.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.51

16.21

-16.72

CELU vs. XBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CELU Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the XBI Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CELU and XBI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CELUXBIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

2.28

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.48

-0.04

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

0.36

-0.82

Correlation

The correlation between CELU and XBI is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CELU vs. XBI - Dividend Comparison

CELU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CELU
Celularity Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
0.34%0.37%0.15%0.02%0.00%0.04%0.20%0.00%0.28%0.24%0.26%0.61%

Drawdowns

CELU vs. XBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CELU drawdown since its inception was -99.16%, which is greater than XBI's maximum drawdown of -63.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELU and XBI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CELUXBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.16%

-63.89%

-35.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.25%

-13.39%

-59.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.16%

-55.04%

-44.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.99%

-25.70%

-73.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.97%

-20.91%

-41.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.81%

3.65%

+44.16%

Volatility

CELU vs. XBI - Volatility Comparison

Celularity Inc. (CELU) has a higher volatility of 20.28% compared to SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) at 11.31%. This indicates that CELU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CELUXBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.28%

11.31%

+8.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.97%

19.25%

+34.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

105.84%

28.95%

+76.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

120.99%

32.23%

+88.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

105.65%

32.15%

+73.50%