PortfoliosLab logo
CELFX vs. FBKWX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CELFX and FBKWX is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CELFX vs. FBKWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cliffwater Enhanced Lending Fund (CELFX) and Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z (FBKWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
53.92%
-1.72%
CELFX
FBKWX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CELFX:

1.78

FBKWX:

1.07

Sortino Ratio

CELFX:

2.24

FBKWX:

1.67

Omega Ratio

CELFX:

2.52

FBKWX:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

CELFX:

3.07

FBKWX:

0.62

Martin Ratio

CELFX:

7.56

FBKWX:

3.34

Ulcer Index

CELFX:

1.16%

FBKWX:

1.77%

Daily Std Dev

CELFX:

4.91%

FBKWX:

5.27%

Max Drawdown

CELFX:

-2.87%

FBKWX:

-18.08%

Current Drawdown

CELFX:

-1.88%

FBKWX:

-3.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CELFX achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than FBKWX's 1.90% return.


CELFX

YTD

0.92%

1M

0.92%

6M

2.45%

1Y

8.70%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FBKWX

YTD

1.90%

1M

0.69%

6M

1.07%

1Y

5.68%

5Y*

0.41%

10Y*

2.14%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CELFX vs. FBKWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CELFX has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FBKWX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CELFX vs. FBKWX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CELFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CELFX is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CELFX is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CELFX is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CELFX is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CELFX is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CELFX is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FBKWX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBKWX is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBKWX is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBKWX is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBKWX is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBKWX is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBKWX is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CELFX vs. FBKWX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cliffwater Enhanced Lending Fund (CELFX) and Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z (FBKWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CELFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the FBKWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CELFX and FBKWX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.008.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.77
1.07
CELFX
FBKWX

Dividends

CELFX vs. FBKWX - Dividend Comparison

CELFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.20%, more than FBKWX's 4.60% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CELFX
Cliffwater Enhanced Lending Fund
11.20%11.26%10.67%9.42%3.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBKWX
Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z
4.60%4.60%4.23%3.42%2.29%2.62%3.02%3.31%2.84%3.06%3.81%0.22%

Drawdowns

CELFX vs. FBKWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CELFX drawdown since its inception was -2.87%, smaller than the maximum FBKWX drawdown of -18.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELFX and FBKWX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.88%
-3.12%
CELFX
FBKWX

Volatility

CELFX vs. FBKWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cliffwater Enhanced Lending Fund (CELFX) is 0.25%, while Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z (FBKWX) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that CELFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBKWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.25%
1.67%
CELFX
FBKWX