PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEG vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEG vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEG achieves a -27.96% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return.


CEG

1D
2.86%
1M
-7.54%
YTD
-27.96%
6M
-27.70%
1Y
-15.08%
3Y*
40.06%
5Y*
10Y*

SMH

1D
1.72%
1M
8.30%
YTD
72.15%
6M
75.62%
1Y
136.32%
3Y*
60.05%
5Y*
38.42%
10Y*
37.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEG vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CEG
Constellation Energy Corp
-27.96%58.80%92.71%37.24%73.87%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
72.15%49.17%39.10%73.38%-25.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CEG and SMH is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEG vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEG
CEG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEG Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEG vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CEGSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.60

-0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

9.18

-9.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.78

33.74

-34.52

CEG vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEG Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEG and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CEG vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEG drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEG and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEGSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.70%

-84.96%

+34.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.77%

-14.93%

-24.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.70%

-35.74%

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.93%

-2.81%

-34.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.67%

-41.04%

+29.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.38%

4.06%

+15.32%

Volatility

CEG vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) is 15.26%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that CEG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEGSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.26%

16.25%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.72%

27.73%

+9.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.66%

33.20%

+13.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.38%

35.47%

+13.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.38%

32.82%

+16.56%

Dividends

CEG vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

CEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEG
Constellation Energy Corp
0.64%0.44%0.63%0.97%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEG and SMH have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to CEG (15.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEG dropped -50.70% vs SMH's -84.96%.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEG and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer