CEFS vs. VUG
CEFS (Saba Closed-End Funds ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEFS is a Event Driven fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. CEFS is actively managed, while VUG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEFS returned 13.85%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for VUG. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEFS charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
CEFS vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEFS achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return.
CEFS
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 15.64%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 13.85%
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
CEFS vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 13.75% | 16.67% | 23.48% | 20.99% | -7.08% | 17.86% | 3.40% | 28.41% | -9.97% | 7.63% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.49% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 10.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFS and VUG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | 0.52 |
The correlation between CEFS and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
CEFS vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CEFS
VUG
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
CEFS
VUG
Technology
CEFS
VUG
Energy
CEFS
VUG
Industrials
CEFS
VUG
Healthcare
CEFS
VUG
Utilities
CEFS
VUG
Communication Services
CEFS
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
CEFS
VUG
Consumer Defensive
CEFS
VUG
Basic Materials
CEFS
VUG
Real Estate
CEFS
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEFS vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
CEFS
VUG
CEFS vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEFS | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.31 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.43 | 1.69 | +2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.26 | 5.92 | +11.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEFS | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 1.77 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.68 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.62 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
CEFS vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFS drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFS and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFS | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.99% | -50.68% | +11.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -16.53% | +10.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.37% | -22.85% | +9.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -35.61% | +18.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -1.51% | +1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -7.09% | +3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 4.71% | -3.26% |
Volatility
CEFS vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) is 3.37%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that CEFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEFS | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 3.83% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.56% | 12.11% | -3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.95% | 15.84% | -5.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 22.22% | -9.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 21.44% | -6.11% |
CEFS vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFS has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEFS vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
CEFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 7.10% | 7.84% | 8.79% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 10.73% | 8.61% | 8.10% | 10.43% | 5.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEFS and VUG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to CEFS (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFS dropped -38.99% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 5-year performance, VUG leads with 15.11% vs 13.85% for CEFS. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, CEFS has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VUG has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 13.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for CEFS.
CEFS has the higher dividend yield at 7.10%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.
CEFS is categorized as Event Driven, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for CEFS and 0.03% for VUG.
CEFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEFS and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer