PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CEFS vs. HYGV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CEFS and HYGV is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

CEFS vs. HYGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
7.50%
4.98%
CEFS
HYGV

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CEFS:

2.37

HYGV:

1.92

Sortino Ratio

CEFS:

3.19

HYGV:

2.77

Omega Ratio

CEFS:

1.41

HYGV:

1.36

Calmar Ratio

CEFS:

4.25

HYGV:

2.57

Martin Ratio

CEFS:

13.95

HYGV:

13.36

Ulcer Index

CEFS:

1.81%

HYGV:

0.62%

Daily Std Dev

CEFS:

10.66%

HYGV:

4.33%

Max Drawdown

CEFS:

-38.99%

HYGV:

-23.47%

Current Drawdown

CEFS:

-3.85%

HYGV:

-1.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEFS achieves a 23.19% return, which is significantly higher than HYGV's 7.92% return.


CEFS

YTD

23.19%

1M

-0.74%

6M

7.51%

1Y

24.50%

5Y*

11.23%

10Y*

N/A

HYGV

YTD

7.92%

1M

-0.09%

6M

4.98%

1Y

7.71%

5Y*

4.17%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CEFS vs. HYGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEFS has a 3.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HYGV's 0.37% expense ratio.


CEFS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
Expense ratio chart for CEFS: current value at 3.80% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%3.80%
Expense ratio chart for HYGV: current value at 0.37% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.37%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CEFS vs. HYGV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CEFS, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.371.92
The chart of Sortino ratio for CEFS, currently valued at 3.19, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.192.77
The chart of Omega ratio for CEFS, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.411.36
The chart of Calmar ratio for CEFS, currently valued at 4.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.252.57
The chart of Martin ratio for CEFS, currently valued at 13.95, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0013.9513.36
CEFS
HYGV

The current CEFS Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the HYGV Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEFS and HYGV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.002.503.003.504.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.37
1.92
CEFS
HYGV

Dividends

CEFS vs. HYGV - Dividend Comparison

CEFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, less than HYGV's 8.21% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
CEFS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
7.09%9.20%11.32%10.73%8.61%7.56%9.84%6.28%
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund
8.21%8.77%7.64%7.15%6.18%7.95%5.63%0.00%

Drawdowns

CEFS vs. HYGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEFS drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, which is greater than HYGV's maximum drawdown of -23.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFS and HYGV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-3.85%
-1.09%
CEFS
HYGV

Volatility

CEFS vs. HYGV - Volatility Comparison

Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) at 1.46%. This indicates that CEFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.66%
1.46%
CEFS
HYGV
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab