PortfoliosLab logo
CEFS vs. HYGV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CEFS and HYGV is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CEFS vs. HYGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

CEFS:

8.63%

HYGV:

6.11%

Max Drawdown

CEFS:

-0.89%

HYGV:

-23.47%

Current Drawdown

CEFS:

-0.37%

HYGV:

-1.69%

Returns By Period


CEFS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

HYGV

YTD

0.27%

1M

2.92%

6M

-0.18%

1Y

6.29%

5Y*

6.31%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CEFS vs. HYGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEFS has a 3.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HYGV's 0.37% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CEFS vs. HYGV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEFS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CEFS is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CEFS is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CEFS is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CEFS is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CEFS is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CEFS is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HYGV is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HYGV is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HYGV is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HYGV is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HYGV is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HYGV is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CEFS vs. HYGV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

CEFS vs. HYGV - Dividend Comparison

CEFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
CEFS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund
8.01%8.20%8.77%7.64%6.07%6.18%7.95%5.63%

Drawdowns

CEFS vs. HYGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEFS drawdown since its inception was -0.89%, smaller than the maximum HYGV drawdown of -23.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFS and HYGV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CEFS vs. HYGV - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...