CEFS vs. BST
Compare and contrast key facts about Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST).
CEFS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Mar 21, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CEFS or BST.
Correlation
The correlation between CEFS and BST is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CEFS vs. BST - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CEFS:
2.37
BST:
0.95
CEFS:
3.19
BST:
1.33
CEFS:
1.41
BST:
1.17
CEFS:
4.25
BST:
0.54
CEFS:
13.95
BST:
3.11
CEFS:
1.81%
BST:
5.37%
CEFS:
10.66%
BST:
17.68%
CEFS:
-38.99%
BST:
-46.58%
CEFS:
-3.85%
BST:
-16.89%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEFS achieves a 23.19% return, which is significantly higher than BST's 17.65% return.
CEFS
23.19%
-0.74%
7.51%
24.50%
11.23%
N/A
BST
17.65%
1.14%
1.99%
15.72%
10.60%
15.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CEFS vs. BST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CEFS vs. BST - Dividend Comparison
CEFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, less than BST's 8.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 7.09% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 10.73% | 8.61% | 7.56% | 9.84% | 6.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BST BlackRock Science and Technology Trust | 8.23% | 8.91% | 10.57% | 8.53% | 3.85% | 5.46% | 6.41% | 4.80% | 6.69% | 6.93% | 0.57% |
Drawdowns
CEFS vs. BST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFS drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, smaller than the maximum BST drawdown of -46.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFS and BST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CEFS vs. BST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) is 2.66%, while BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that CEFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.