PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CECO vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CECO vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CECO achieves a 61.52% return, which is significantly higher than SPHQ's 16.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CECO has outperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 28.05%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively lower 15.46% annualized return.


CECO

1D
-3.01%
1M
18.31%
YTD
61.52%
6M
59.36%
1Y
234.38%
3Y*
96.30%
5Y*
66.08%
10Y*
28.05%

SPHQ

1D
-2.93%
1M
2.94%
YTD
16.54%
6M
15.11%
1Y
25.84%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
14.14%
10Y*
15.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CECO vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CECO
CECO Environmental Corp.
61.52%97.98%49.06%73.63%87.48%-10.49%-9.14%13.48%31.58%-62.30%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
16.54%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CECO and SPHQ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2005

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CECO vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CECO
CECO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CECO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CECO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CECO vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CECOSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.34

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.73

2.92

+3.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.03

12.48

+8.55

CECO vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CECO Sharpe Ratio is 3.77, which is higher than the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CECO and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CECO vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CECO drawdown since its inception was -90.64%, which is greater than SPHQ's maximum drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CECO and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CECOSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.64%

-57.83%

-32.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.08%

-8.90%

-26.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.93%

-16.57%

-31.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.93%

-25.04%

-22.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.13%

-31.60%

-42.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-2.93%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.21%

-10.68%

-35.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.20%

2.07%

+9.13%

Volatility

CECO vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) has a higher volatility of 26.06% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 5.88%. This indicates that CECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CECOSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.06%

5.88%

+20.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.17%

11.30%

+39.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.55%

13.46%

+49.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.23%

16.59%

+35.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.03%

17.91%

+34.12%

Dividends

CECO vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

CECO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CECO
CECO Environmental Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.39%1.89%3.44%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.07%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


CECO and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CECO has higher volatility (26.06%) compared to SPHQ (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CECO dropped -90.64% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

CECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.77 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CECO and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer