CECO vs. ATMU
CECO (CECO Environmental Corp.) and ATMU (Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Pollution & Treatment Controls industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 3 years, CECO returned 96.30%/yr vs 32.01%/yr for ATMU. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CECO vs. ATMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CECO achieves a 61.52% return, which is significantly higher than ATMU's -3.20% return.
CECO
- 1D
- -3.01%
- 1M
- 18.31%
- YTD
- 61.52%
- 6M
- 59.36%
- 1Y
- 234.38%
- 3Y*
- 96.30%
- 5Y*
- 66.08%
- 10Y*
- 28.05%
ATMU
- 1D
- -3.78%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- -3.20%
- 6M
- -6.44%
- 1Y
- 42.20%
- 3Y*
- 32.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CECO vs. ATMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CECO CECO Environmental Corp. | 61.52% | 97.98% | 49.06% | 78.68% |
ATMU Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. | -3.20% | 33.16% | 67.28% | 8.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CECO and ATMU is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2023 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
CECO:
$3.55B
ATMU:
$4.11B
CECO:
$0.47
ATMU:
$2.56
CECO:
206.75
ATMU:
19.61
CECO:
0.59
ATMU:
3.53
CECO:
4.36
ATMU:
3.07
CECO:
11.38
ATMU:
10.19
CECO:
$812.38M
ATMU:
$1.35B
CECO:
$278.45M
ATMU:
$529.00M
CECO:
$77.75M
ATMU:
$334.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CECO vs. ATMU — Risk / Return Rank
CECO
ATMU
CECO vs. ATMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) and Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CECO | ATMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.23 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.73 | 1.40 | +5.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.03 | 4.24 | +16.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CECO vs. ATMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CECO drawdown since its inception was -90.64%, which is greater than ATMU's maximum drawdown of -30.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CECO and ATMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CECO | ATMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.64% | -30.22% | -60.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.08% | -30.22% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.93% | -30.22% | -17.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -23.43% | +20.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.21% | -8.77% | -37.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.20% | 9.99% | +1.21% |
Volatility
CECO vs. ATMU - Volatility Comparison
CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) has a higher volatility of 26.06% compared to Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) at 11.26%. This indicates that CECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CECO | ATMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.06% | 11.26% | +14.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.17% | 31.16% | +20.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.55% | 36.49% | +26.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.23% | 34.48% | +17.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.03% | 34.48% | +17.55% |
Dividends
CECO vs. ATMU - Dividend Comparison
CECO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMU Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CECO CECO Environmental Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.39% | 1.89% | 3.44% |
Financials
CECO vs. ATMU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CECO Environmental Corp. and Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CECO and ATMU have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CECO has higher volatility (26.06%) compared to ATMU (11.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CECO dropped -90.64% vs ATMU's -30.22%.
CECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.77 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CECO and ATMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer