PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CECO vs. ATMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CECO vs. ATMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) and Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CECO achieves a 61.52% return, which is significantly higher than ATMU's -3.20% return.


CECO

1D
-3.01%
1M
18.31%
YTD
61.52%
6M
59.36%
1Y
234.38%
3Y*
96.30%
5Y*
66.08%
10Y*
28.05%

ATMU

1D
-3.78%
1M
2.82%
YTD
-3.20%
6M
-6.44%
1Y
42.20%
3Y*
32.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CECO vs. ATMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CECO
CECO Environmental Corp.
61.52%97.98%49.06%78.68%
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.
-3.20%33.16%67.28%8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CECO and ATMU is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2023

0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CECO:

$3.55B

ATMU:

$4.11B

EPS

CECO:

$0.47

ATMU:

$2.56

PE Ratio

CECO:

206.75

ATMU:

19.61

PEG Ratio

CECO:

0.59

ATMU:

3.53

PS Ratio

CECO:

4.36

ATMU:

3.07

PB Ratio

CECO:

11.38

ATMU:

10.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

CECO:

$812.38M

ATMU:

$1.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CECO:

$278.45M

ATMU:

$529.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

CECO:

$77.75M

ATMU:

$334.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CECO vs. ATMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CECO
CECO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CECO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CECO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

ATMU
ATMU Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ATMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATMU Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ATMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATMU Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CECO vs. ATMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) and Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CECOATMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.23

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.73

1.40

+5.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.03

4.24

+16.80

CECO vs. ATMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CECO Sharpe Ratio is 3.77, which is higher than the ATMU Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CECO and ATMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CECO vs. ATMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CECO drawdown since its inception was -90.64%, which is greater than ATMU's maximum drawdown of -30.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CECO and ATMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CECOATMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.64%

-30.22%

-60.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.08%

-30.22%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.93%

-30.22%

-17.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-23.43%

+20.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.21%

-8.77%

-37.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.20%

9.99%

+1.21%

Volatility

CECO vs. ATMU - Volatility Comparison

CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) has a higher volatility of 26.06% compared to Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) at 11.26%. This indicates that CECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CECOATMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.06%

11.26%

+14.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.17%

31.16%

+20.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.55%

36.49%

+26.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.23%

34.48%

+17.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.03%

34.48%

+17.55%

Dividends

CECO vs. ATMU - Dividend Comparison

CECO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.
0.44%0.40%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CECO
CECO Environmental Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.39%1.89%3.44%

Financials

CECO vs. ATMU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CECO Environmental Corp. and Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
214.69M
0
(CECO) Total Revenue
(ATMU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CECO and ATMU have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CECO has higher volatility (26.06%) compared to ATMU (11.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CECO dropped -90.64% vs ATMU's -30.22%.

CECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.77 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CECO and ATMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer