PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CECO vs. ATMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

CECO vs. ATMU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) and Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU).

Performance

CECO vs. ATMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) and Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CECO vs. ATMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
CECO
CECO Environmental Corp.		-0.45%97.98%49.06%81.56%
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.		9.45%33.16%67.28%8.50%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CECO:

$2.19B

ATMU:

$4.68B

EPS

CECO:

$1.37

ATMU:

$2.51

PE Ratio

CECO:

43.54

ATMU:

22.64

PEG Ratio

CECO:

0.12

ATMU:

4.07

PS Ratio

CECO:

2.81

ATMU:

3.56

PB Ratio

CECO:

6.90

ATMU:

12.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

CECO:

$774.38M

ATMU:

$1.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CECO:

$269.23M

ATMU:

$509.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

CECO:

$123.26M

ATMU:

$323.10M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CECO achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than ATMU's 9.45% return.

CECO

1D
4.49%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
16.37%
1Y
161.32%
3Y*
62.09%
5Y*
48.83%
10Y*
25.80%

ATMU

1D
3.56%
1M
-12.03%
YTD
9.45%
6M
26.15%
1Y
55.27%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CECO Environmental Corp.

Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.

Often compared with CECO:
CECO vs. CDRECECO vs. VCECO vs. SPHQCECO vs. SPYCECO vs. VOOCECO vs. RSGCECO vs. ASTS
Often compared with ATMU:
ATMU vs. TTEKATMU vs. MCHPATMU vs. MASIATMU vs. PHATMU vs. LASRATMU vs. RAPTATMU vs. SLGL

Return for Risk

CECO vs. ATMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CECO
CECO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CECO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CECO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
ATMU
ATMU Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ATMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATMU Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ATMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATMU Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CECO vs. ATMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) and Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CECOATMUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.79

1.67

+1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.97

2.34

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

3.16

+1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.62

9.10

+5.53

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CECO vs. ATMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CECO Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the ATMU Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CECO and ATMU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CECOATMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

1.67

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

1.27

-1.11

Correlation

The correlation between CECO and ATMU is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CECO vs. ATMU - Dividend Comparison

CECO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CECO
CECO Environmental Corp.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.39%1.89%3.44%
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.		0.38%0.40%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CECO vs. ATMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CECO drawdown since its inception was -90.64%, which is greater than ATMU's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CECO and ATMU.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

CECOATMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.64%

-28.76%

-61.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.08%

-16.40%

-18.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.94%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.13%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.72%

-13.42%

-11.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.46%

-8.14%

-38.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.35%

5.70%

+4.65%

Volatility

CECO vs. ATMU - Volatility Comparison

CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) has a higher volatility of 18.09% compared to Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) at 11.98%. This indicates that CECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

CECOATMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.09%

11.98%

+6.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.42%

21.33%

+23.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.36%

33.37%

+24.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.37%

32.51%

+17.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.21%

32.51%

+18.70%

Financials

CECO vs. ATMU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CECO Environmental Corp. and Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
214.69M
0
(CECO) Total Revenue
(ATMU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items