PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDZI vs. PCYO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CDZI vs. PCYO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cadiz Inc. (CDZI) and Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDZI achieves a -27.45% return, which is significantly lower than PCYO's 0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, CDZI has underperformed PCYO with an annualized return of -2.64%, while PCYO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.02% annualized return.


CDZI

1D
1.75%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
-27.45%
6M
-29.09%
1Y
30.87%
3Y*
1.17%
5Y*
-20.57%
10Y*
-2.64%

PCYO

1D
-1.07%
1M
10.06%
YTD
0.55%
6M
-1.69%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
1.33%
5Y*
-4.95%
10Y*
9.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDZI vs. PCYO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDZI
Cadiz Inc.
-27.45%7.88%85.71%12.00%-35.23%-63.76%-3.36%6.99%-27.72%14.00%
PCYO
Pure Cycle Corporation
0.55%-13.33%21.11%-0.10%-28.22%30.01%-10.80%26.79%18.92%51.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CDZI and PCYO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997

0.08

The correlation between CDZI and PCYO shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CDZI:

$329.93M

PCYO:

$267.10M

EPS

CDZI:

-$0.42

PCYO:

$0.61

PS Ratio

CDZI:

20.39

PCYO:

8.71

PB Ratio

CDZI:

14.19

PCYO:

1.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

CDZI:

$16.31M

PCYO:

$30.64M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CDZI:

$5.15M

PCYO:

$18.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

CDZI:

-$25.60M

PCYO:

$19.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cadiz Inc.

Pure Cycle Corporation

Return for Risk

CDZI vs. PCYO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDZI
CDZI Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CDZI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDZI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDZI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CDZI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDZI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

PCYO
PCYO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PCYO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCYO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCYO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PCYO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCYO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDZI vs. PCYO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadiz Inc. (CDZI) and Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDZIPCYODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.07

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

0.42

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

0.90

+0.58

CDZI vs. PCYO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDZI Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the PCYO Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDZI and PCYO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDZI vs. PCYO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDZI drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than PCYO's maximum drawdown of -89.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDZI and PCYO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDZIPCYODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.57%

-89.13%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.38%

-17.50%

-27.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.47%

-33.36%

-23.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.21%

-51.46%

-37.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.16%

-52.49%

-37.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.82%

-32.79%

-66.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.77%

-52.41%

-23.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.01%

8.14%

+12.87%

Volatility

CDZI vs. PCYO - Volatility Comparison

Cadiz Inc. (CDZI) has a higher volatility of 21.32% compared to Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) at 9.05%. This indicates that CDZI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCYO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDZIPCYODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.32%

9.05%

+12.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.92%

23.61%

+17.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.36%

29.56%

+29.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.24%

32.23%

+40.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.73%

35.52%

+22.21%

Dividends

CDZI vs. PCYO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CDZI nor PCYO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CDZI vs. PCYO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cadiz Inc. and Pure Cycle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00M4.00M6.00M8.00M10.00M12.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
5.08M
5.17M
(CDZI) Total Revenue
(PCYO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CDZI and PCYO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDZI has higher volatility (21.32%) compared to PCYO (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDZI dropped -99.57% vs PCYO's -89.13%.

CDZI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDZI and PCYO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer