CDT vs. VOOG
CDT (Conduit Pharmaceuticals Inc.) is a stock, while VOOG (Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Over the past year, CDT returned -99.75% vs 26.86% for VOOG. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CDT vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDT achieves a -96.41% return, which is significantly lower than VOOG's 8.71% return.
CDT
- 1D
- -23.33%
- 1M
- 9.52%
- YTD
- -96.41%
- 6M
- -97.09%
- 1Y
- -99.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOOG
- 1D
- -2.34%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- 8.71%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- 1Y
- 26.86%
- 3Y*
- 25.47%
- 5Y*
- 14.06%
- 10Y*
- 18.00%
CDT vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CDT Conduit Pharmaceuticals Inc. | -96.41% | -99.84% | -98.49% | -64.70% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 8.71% | 22.11% | 35.89% | 9.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDT and VOOG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2023 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDT vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank
CDT
VOOG
CDT vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conduit Pharmaceuticals Inc. (CDT) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDT | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.58 | 1.28 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 1.97 | -2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 7.82 | -8.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDT vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDT drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDT and VOOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDT | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -32.73% | -67.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.88% | -13.71% | -86.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -5.49% | -94.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.02% | -4.96% | -88.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 84.45% | 3.45% | +81.00% |
Volatility
CDT vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison
Conduit Pharmaceuticals Inc. (CDT) has a higher volatility of 76.53% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) at 7.23%. This indicates that CDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDT | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 76.53% | 7.23% | +69.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 136.28% | 13.86% | +122.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 162.54% | 17.04% | +145.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 183.44% | 21.38% | +162.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 183.44% | 20.81% | +162.63% |
Dividends
CDT vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison
CDT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDT Conduit Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.46% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 1.12% | 0.93% | 0.53% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.34% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDT and VOOG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDT has higher volatility (76.53%) compared to VOOG (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDT dropped -100.00% vs VOOG's -32.73%.
VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDT and VOOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer