PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CDNS vs. ANSS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CDNSANSS
YTD Return0.80%-11.41%
1Y Return31.38%4.10%
3Y Return (Ann)27.76%-4.21%
5Y Return (Ann)31.42%10.83%
10Y Return (Ann)33.32%15.85%
Sharpe Ratio1.070.08
Daily Std Dev28.30%30.61%
Max Drawdown-93.13%-63.28%
Current Drawdown-14.95%-21.82%

Fundamentals


CDNSANSS
Market Cap$76.85B$29.14B
EPS$3.84$5.74
PE Ratio73.5458.14
PEG Ratio2.842.09
Revenue (TTM)$4.08B$2.27B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.19B$1.88B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.36B$758.64M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CDNS and ANSS is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CDNS vs. ANSS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CDNS achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than ANSS's -11.41% return. Over the past 10 years, CDNS has outperformed ANSS with an annualized return of 33.32%, while ANSS has yielded a comparatively lower 15.85% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


2,000.00%4,000.00%6,000.00%8,000.00%10,000.00%12,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1,299.34%
10,724.24%
CDNS
ANSS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

ANSYS, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CDNS vs. ANSS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and ANSYS, Inc. (ANSS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDNS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.78
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CDNS, currently valued at 6.44, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.44
ANSS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ANSS, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ANSS, currently valued at 0.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.37
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ANSS, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.04
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ANSS, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ANSS, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.22

CDNS vs. ANSS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDNS Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the ANSS Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CDNS and ANSS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.07
0.08
CDNS
ANSS

Dividends

CDNS vs. ANSS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CDNS nor ANSS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CDNS vs. ANSS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDNS drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, which is greater than ANSS's maximum drawdown of -63.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNS and ANSS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-14.95%
-21.82%
CDNS
ANSS

Volatility

CDNS vs. ANSS - Volatility Comparison

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to ANSYS, Inc. (ANSS) at 4.67%. This indicates that CDNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANSS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.83%
4.67%
CDNS
ANSS

Financials

CDNS vs. ANSS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and ANSYS, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items