PortfoliosLab logo
CDNS vs. ANSS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CDNS and ANSS is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CDNS vs. ANSS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and ANSYS, Inc. (ANSS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CDNS:

0.21

ANSS:

0.16

Sortino Ratio

CDNS:

0.71

ANSS:

0.45

Omega Ratio

CDNS:

1.09

ANSS:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

CDNS:

0.42

ANSS:

0.15

Martin Ratio

CDNS:

0.83

ANSS:

0.67

Ulcer Index

CDNS:

14.61%

ANSS:

6.98%

Daily Std Dev

CDNS:

41.74%

ANSS:

25.26%

Max Drawdown

CDNS:

-93.13%

ANSS:

-63.41%

Current Drawdown

CDNS:

-2.37%

ANSS:

-16.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CDNS:

$87.21B

ANSS:

$30.20B

EPS

CDNS:

$3.95

ANSS:

$6.75

PE Ratio

CDNS:

80.86

ANSS:

50.89

PEG Ratio

CDNS:

3.36

ANSS:

2.28

PS Ratio

CDNS:

17.89

ANSS:

11.69

PB Ratio

CDNS:

18.22

ANSS:

4.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

CDNS:

$4.87B

ANSS:

$2.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CDNS:

$4.56B

ANSS:

$2.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

CDNS:

$1.64B

ANSS:

$926.17M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDNS achieves a 6.09% return, which is significantly higher than ANSS's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CDNS has outperformed ANSS with an annualized return of 32.34%, while ANSS has yielded a comparatively lower 14.33% annualized return.


CDNS

YTD

6.09%

1M

20.60%

6M

5.19%

1Y

8.76%

5Y*

31.29%

10Y*

32.34%

ANSS

YTD

1.83%

1M

12.97%

6M

0.95%

1Y

4.13%

5Y*

6.25%

10Y*

14.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CDNS vs. ANSS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDNS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CDNS is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CDNS is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CDNS is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CDNS is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CDNS is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CDNS is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ANSS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ANSS is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ANSS is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ANSS is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ANSS is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ANSS is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ANSS is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CDNS vs. ANSS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and ANSYS, Inc. (ANSS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CDNS Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is comparable to the ANSS Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDNS and ANSS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CDNS vs. ANSS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CDNS nor ANSS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CDNS vs. ANSS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDNS drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, which is greater than ANSS's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNS and ANSS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CDNS vs. ANSS - Volatility Comparison

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a higher volatility of 10.79% compared to ANSYS, Inc. (ANSS) at 6.75%. This indicates that CDNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANSS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CDNS vs. ANSS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and ANSYS, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20212022202320242025
1.24B
504.89M
(CDNS) Total Revenue
(ANSS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CDNS vs. ANSS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and ANSYS, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

82.0%84.0%86.0%88.0%90.0%92.0%94.0%96.0%20212022202320242025
95.9%
85.6%
(CDNS) Gross Margin
(ANSS) Gross Margin
CDNS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

ANSS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ANSYS, Inc. reported a gross profit of 432.32M and revenue of 504.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.6%.

CDNS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 361.52M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.

ANSS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ANSYS, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.89M and revenue of 504.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

CDNS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 273.58M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.

ANSS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ANSYS, Inc. reported a net income of 51.87M and revenue of 504.89M, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.