PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CCSI vs. PANW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CCSIPANW
YTD Return-4.43%32.73%
1Y Return11.58%61.34%
3Y Return (Ann)-27.29%31.94%
Sharpe Ratio0.141.41
Sortino Ratio0.821.70
Omega Ratio1.101.31
Calmar Ratio0.132.04
Martin Ratio0.354.29
Ulcer Index30.75%14.53%
Daily Std Dev74.60%44.12%
Max Drawdown-82.39%-47.98%
Current Drawdown-62.10%0.00%

Fundamentals


CCSIPANW
Market Cap$483.56M$128.09B
EPS$4.56$7.36
PE Ratio5.4953.18
Total Revenue (TTM)$351.15M$6.15B
Gross Profit (TTM)$282.61M$4.56B
EBITDA (TTM)$165.75M$866.40M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between CCSI and PANW is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CCSI vs. PANW - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CCSI achieves a -4.43% return, which is significantly lower than PANW's 32.73% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
31.10%
31.58%
CCSI
PANW

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CCSI vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCSI
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CCSI, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CCSI, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CCSI, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CCSI, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CCSI, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.35
PANW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PANW, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PANW, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.70
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PANW, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PANW, currently valued at 2.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.04
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PANW, currently valued at 4.29, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.29

CCSI vs. PANW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the PANW Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSI and PANW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.14
1.41
CCSI
PANW

Dividends

CCSI vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison

Neither CCSI nor PANW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CCSI vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSI drawdown since its inception was -82.39%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSI and PANW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-62.10%
0
CCSI
PANW

Volatility

CCSI vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison

Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) has a higher volatility of 16.54% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) at 8.12%. This indicates that CCSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.54%
8.12%
CCSI
PANW

Financials

CCSI vs. PANW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items