CCSI vs. PANW

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW).

Performance

CCSI vs. PANW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CCSI vs. PANW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CCSI Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.	8.48%	-8.55%	-8.97%	-51.25%	-7.10%	-10.80%
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc.	-12.77%	1.23%	23.41%	111.32%	-24.81%	12.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CCSI : $458.33M PANW : $114.56B
EPS CCSI : $4.36 PANW : $1.81
PE Ratio CCSI : 5.42 PANW : 88.94
PS Ratio CCSI : 1.31 PANW : 11.52
PB Ratio CCSI : 33.28 PANW : 12.20
Total Revenue (TTM) CCSI : $349.70M PANW : $9.89B
Gross Profit (TTM) CCSI : $279.10M PANW : $7.27B
EBITDA (TTM) CCSI : $162.92M PANW : $2.04B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSI achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly higher than PANW's -12.77% return.

CCSI

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -20.52%
• YTD: 8.48%
• 6M: -17.90%
• 1Y: 3.36%
• 3Y*: -11.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PANW

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 7.01%
• YTD: -12.77%
• 6M: -22.31%
• 1Y: -6.21%
• 3Y*: 17.17%
• 5Y*: 24.06%
• 10Y*: 19.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CCSI vs. PANW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCSI

CCSI Risk / Return Rank: 41
CCSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
CCSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
CCSI Omega Ratio Rank: 40
CCSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
CCSI Martin Ratio Rank: 43

PANW

PANW Risk / Return Rank: 32
PANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
PANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
PANW Omega Ratio Rank: 29
PANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
PANW Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCSI vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCSI	PANW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	-0.17	+0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.45	0.01	+0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.00	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.08	-0.16	+0.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.17	-0.41	+0.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCSI vs. PANW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the PANW Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSI and PANW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCSI	PANW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07	-0.17	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.36	0.61	-0.97

Correlation

The correlation between CCSI and PANW is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CCSI vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison

Neither CCSI nor PANW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CCSI vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSI drawdown since its inception was -82.39%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSI and PANW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCSI	PANW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.39%	-47.98%	-34.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.90%	-36.01%	+4.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.19%	-27.42%	-36.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.69%	-14.72%	-33.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.92%	14.28%	+0.64%

Volatility

CCSI vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison

Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) have volatilities of 12.37% and 12.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCSI	PANW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.37%	12.10%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.43%	25.19%	+11.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.75%	36.72%	+12.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.64%	40.60%	+15.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.64%	38.47%	+17.17%

Financials

CCSI vs. PANW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CCSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 69.68M and revenue of 87.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.0%.

PANW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.91B and revenue of 2.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.6%.

CCSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.76M and revenue of 87.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.1%.

PANW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 397.00M and revenue of 2.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

CCSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 20.50M and revenue of 87.07M, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.

PANW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 2.59B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.