CCSI vs. PANW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CCSI (Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.) and PANW (Palo Alto Networks, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Infrastructure industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, CCSI returned -1.72%/yr vs 39.86%/yr for PANW. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CCSI vs. PANW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CCSI having a 59.07% return and PANW slightly higher at 61.34%.

CCSI

• 1D: -2.25%
• 1M: 26.40%
• YTD: 59.07%
• 6M: 54.40%
• 1Y: 63.80%
• 3Y*: -1.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PANW

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 64.12%
• YTD: 61.34%
• 6M: 56.51%
• 1Y: 52.51%
• 3Y*: 39.86%
• 5Y*: 38.40%
• 10Y*: 29.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCSI vs. PANW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CCSI Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.	59.07%	-8.55%	-8.97%	-51.25%	-7.10%	-10.80%
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc.	61.34%	1.23%	23.41%	111.32%	-24.81%	12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSI and PANW is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2021	0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap CCSI : $660.92M PANW : $221.10B
EPS CCSI : $4.57 PANW : $1.17
PE Ratio CCSI : 7.60 PANW : 253.44
PS Ratio CCSI : 1.91 PANW : 20.14
PB Ratio CCSI : 30.04 PANW : 7.99
Total Revenue (TTM) CCSI : $351.03M PANW : $10.61B
Gross Profit (TTM) CCSI : $281.59M PANW : $7.63B
EBITDA (TTM) CCSI : $163.09M PANW : $1.33B

Return for Risk

CCSI vs. PANW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCSI

CCSI Risk / Return Rank: 72
CCSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
CCSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
CCSI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CCSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
CCSI Martin Ratio Rank: 69

PANW

PANW Risk / Return Rank: 72
PANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
PANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
PANW Omega Ratio Rank: 73
PANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PANW Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCSI vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCSI	PANW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.39	-0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	1.89	-0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.25	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	1.51	+0.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.77	3.45	+0.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCSI vs. PANW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the PANW Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSI and PANW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCSI	PANW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	1.39	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.22	0.74	-0.96

Drawdowns

CCSI vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSI drawdown since its inception was -82.39%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSI and PANW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCSI	PANW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.39%	-47.98%	-34.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.90%	-36.01%	+4.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.17%	-36.01%	-32.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.48%	-1.10%	-46.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.02%	-14.70%	-34.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.38%	15.78%	-0.40%

Volatility

CCSI vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison

Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) has a higher volatility of 25.92% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) at 14.84%. This indicates that CCSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCSI	PANW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.92%	14.84%	+11.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.36%	31.10%	+9.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.07%	37.95%	+16.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.50%	41.56%	+14.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.50%	38.54%	+17.96%

Dividends

CCSI vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison

Neither CCSI nor PANW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CCSI vs. PANW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CCSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 71.57M and revenue of 88.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.9%.

PANW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

CCSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 37.74M and revenue of 88.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

PANW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of -186.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.2%.

CCSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 24.69M and revenue of 88.47M, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.

PANW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of -177.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of -5.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCSI and PANW in my portfolio?

CCSI and PANW have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCSI or PANW?

CCSI has higher volatility (25.92%) compared to PANW (14.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSI dropped -82.39% vs PANW's -47.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.