PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCSI vs. BR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCSI vs. BR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSI achieves a 59.07% return, which is significantly higher than BR's -30.24% return.


CCSI

1D
-2.25%
1M
26.40%
YTD
59.07%
6M
54.40%
1Y
63.80%
3Y*
-1.72%
5Y*
10Y*

BR

1D
-3.21%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
-30.24%
6M
-31.31%
1Y
-35.01%
3Y*
2.03%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
11.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCSI vs. BR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CCSI
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
59.07%-8.55%-8.97%-51.25%-7.10%-10.80%
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
-30.24%0.27%11.65%56.23%-25.26%8.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSI and BR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2021

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCSI:

$660.92M

BR:

$18.12B

EPS

CCSI:

$4.57

BR:

$9.35

PE Ratio

CCSI:

7.60

BR:

16.57

PS Ratio

CCSI:

1.91

BR:

2.49

PB Ratio

CCSI:

30.04

BR:

6.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCSI:

$351.03M

BR:

$7.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCSI:

$281.59M

BR:

$2.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCSI:

$163.09M

BR:

$1.98B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCSI vs. BR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCSI
CCSI Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CCSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CCSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCSI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BR
BR Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BR Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCSI vs. BR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCSIBRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

-1.39

+2.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.85

-2.02

+3.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.75

+0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

-0.77

+2.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.77

-1.49

+5.26

CCSI vs. BR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the BR Sharpe Ratio of -1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSI and BR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCSIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

-1.39

+2.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

0.52

-0.74

Drawdowns

CCSI vs. BR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSI drawdown since its inception was -82.39%, which is greater than BR's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSI and BR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCSIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.39%

-59.02%

-23.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.90%

-45.55%

+13.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.17%

-45.55%

-22.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.48%

-41.19%

-6.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.02%

-8.99%

-40.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.38%

23.55%

-8.17%

Volatility

CCSI vs. BR - Volatility Comparison

Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) has a higher volatility of 25.92% compared to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) at 9.12%. This indicates that CCSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCSIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.92%

9.12%

+16.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.36%

21.48%

+18.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.07%

25.27%

+28.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.50%

23.41%

+33.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.50%

23.88%

+32.62%

Dividends

CCSI vs. BR - Dividend Comparison

CCSI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
2.46%1.66%1.49%1.48%2.04%1.33%1.46%1.66%1.77%1.53%1.90%2.12%
CCSI
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CCSI vs. BR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
88.47M
1.95B
(CCSI) Total Revenue
(BR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCSI vs. BR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
80.9%
32.1%
Portfolio components
CCSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 71.57M and revenue of 88.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.9%.

BR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 626.90M and revenue of 1.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.

CCSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 37.74M and revenue of 88.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

BR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 359.50M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

CCSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 24.69M and revenue of 88.47M, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.

BR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 276.30M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCSI and BR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCSI has higher volatility (25.92%) compared to BR (9.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSI dropped -82.39% vs BR's -59.02%.

CCSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCSI and BR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer