PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCOEY vs. NTDOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCOEY vs. NTDOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capcom Co Ltd ADR (CCOEY) and Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCOEY achieves a -23.74% return, which is significantly higher than NTDOY's -37.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CCOEY has outperformed NTDOY with an annualized return of 12.97%, while NTDOY has yielded a comparatively lower 12.14% annualized return.


CCOEY

1D
-1.57%
1M
-11.38%
YTD
-23.74%
6M
-23.41%
1Y
-46.37%
3Y*
-1.91%
5Y*
4.20%
10Y*
12.97%

NTDOY

1D
-1.41%
1M
-7.56%
YTD
-37.60%
6M
-37.01%
1Y
-52.71%
3Y*
-0.27%
5Y*
-5.95%
10Y*
12.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCOEY vs. NTDOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCOEY
Capcom Co Ltd ADR
-23.74%6.39%36.45%2.65%37.20%-28.87%129.80%41.01%-36.62%32.30%
NTDOY
Nintendo Co ADR
-37.60%16.19%13.11%24.66%-10.74%-27.51%61.36%50.76%-26.56%76.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CCOEY and NTDOY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2013

0.24

Over the past year, CCOEY and NTDOY have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCOEY:

$7.36B

NTDOY:

$48.73B

EPS

CCOEY:

¥66.04

NTDOY:

¥92.44

PE Ratio

CCOEY:

21.55

NTDOY:

18.39

PEG Ratio

CCOEY:

1.35

NTDOY:

3.31

PS Ratio

CCOEY:

6.01

NTDOY:

3.37

PB Ratio

CCOEY:

4.43

NTDOY:

2.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCOEY:

¥198.07B

NTDOY:

¥2.34T

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCOEY:

¥111.65B

NTDOY:

¥921.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCOEY:

¥80.47B

NTDOY:

¥500.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCOEY vs. NTDOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOEY
CCOEY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CCOEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOEY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOEY Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

NTDOY
NTDOY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NTDOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTDOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTDOY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
NTDOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTDOY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCOEY vs. NTDOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capcom Co Ltd ADR (CCOEY) and Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCOEYNTDOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

0.75

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

-0.91

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

-1.57

+0.08

CCOEY vs. NTDOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCOEY Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is comparable to the NTDOY Sharpe Ratio of -1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCOEY and NTDOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCOEY vs. NTDOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCOEY drawdown since its inception was -63.47%, smaller than the maximum NTDOY drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOEY and NTDOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCOEYNTDOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.47%

-83.59%

+20.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.30%

-58.02%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.30%

-58.02%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.30%

-58.02%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.47%

-58.02%

-5.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.54%

-57.73%

+9.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.96%

-37.61%

+17.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.00%

33.51%

-2.51%

Volatility

CCOEY vs. NTDOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capcom Co Ltd ADR (CCOEY) is 10.49%, while Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that CCOEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTDOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCOEYNTDOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.49%

13.02%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.33%

32.44%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.62%

39.49%

+3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.34%

30.41%

+7.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.88%

36.42%

+7.46%

Dividends

CCOEY vs. NTDOY - Dividend Comparison

Neither CCOEY nor NTDOY has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCOEY
Capcom Co Ltd ADR
0.00%0.64%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.73%0.97%0.00%
NTDOY
Nintendo Co ADR
0.00%0.87%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%0.56%1.23%

Financials

CCOEY vs. NTDOY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Capcom Co Ltd ADR and Nintendo Co ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B20222023202420252026
81.52B
414.65B
(CCOEY) Total Revenue
(NTDOY) Total Revenue
Values in JPY except per share items

CCOEY vs. NTDOY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Capcom Co Ltd ADR and Nintendo Co ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
43.3%
48.3%
Portfolio components
CCOEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capcom Co Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 35.31B and revenue of 81.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.3%.

NTDOY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported a gross profit of 200.11B and revenue of 414.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.

CCOEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capcom Co Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 21.38B and revenue of 81.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.

NTDOY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported an operating income of 60.82B and revenue of 414.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.

CCOEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capcom Co Ltd ADR reported a net income of 15.99B and revenue of 81.52B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.

NTDOY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported a net income of 66.39B and revenue of 414.65B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCOEY and NTDOY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTDOY has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to CCOEY (10.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCOEY dropped -63.47% vs NTDOY's -83.59%.

CCOEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.09 vs -1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCOEY and NTDOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer