CCO.TO vs. NTR.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) and Nutrien Ltd. (NTR.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CCO.TO or NTR.TO.
Key characteristics
| CCO.TO | NTR.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 29.84% | -10.10% |
| 1Y Return | 23.10% | -12.32% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 29.43% | -6.18% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 43.38% | 3.04% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.54 | -0.38 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.02 | -0.40 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.13 | 0.96 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.68 | -0.18 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.66 | -0.71 |
| Ulcer Index | 13.94% | 13.92% |
| Daily Std Dev | 42.47% | 26.01% |
| Max Drawdown | -83.92% | -54.78% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.43% | -51.43% |
Fundamentals
| CCO.TO | NTR.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$33.02B | CA$32.34B |
| EPS | CA$0.27 | CA$2.06 |
| PE Ratio | 281.00 | 31.82 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.94 | 1.07 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$2.80B | CA$21.21B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$593.42M | CA$6.22B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$427.12M | CA$4.22B |
Correlation
The correlation between CCO.TO and NTR.TO is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CCO.TO vs. NTR.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CCO.TO achieves a 29.84% return, which is significantly higher than NTR.TO's -10.10% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CCO.TO vs. NTR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) and Nutrien Ltd. (NTR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CCO.TO vs. NTR.TO - Dividend Comparison
CCO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than NTR.TO's 3.28% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCO.TO Cameco Corporation | 0.12% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.22% | 0.35% | 1.21% | 0.39% | 2.76% | 2.28% | 1.82% | 1.84% | 1.72% |
NTR.TO Nutrien Ltd. | 3.28% | 2.84% | 2.61% | 2.55% | 2.94% | 2.83% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CCO.TO vs. NTR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCO.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.92%, which is greater than NTR.TO's maximum drawdown of -54.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCO.TO and NTR.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CCO.TO vs. NTR.TO - Volatility Comparison
Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.22% compared to Nutrien Ltd. (NTR.TO) at 7.83%. This indicates that CCO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CCO.TO vs. NTR.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Nutrien Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities