Correlation
The correlation between CCMG and VT is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
CCMG vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about CCM Global Equity ETF (CCMG) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
CCMG and VT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CCMG is a passively managed fund by CCM that tracks the performance of the NONE. It was launched on Jan 17, 2024. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both CCMG and VT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CCMG or VT.
Performance
CCMG vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
CCMG:
0.50
VT:
0.78
CCMG:
0.77
VT:
1.09
CCMG:
1.10
VT:
1.16
CCMG:
0.50
VT:
0.75
CCMG:
2.09
VT:
3.29
CCMG:
3.49%
VT:
3.77%
CCMG:
15.70%
VT:
17.81%
CCMG:
-14.51%
VT:
-50.27%
CCMG:
-1.29%
VT:
-0.48%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCMG achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 5.36% return.
CCMG
4.61%
3.51%
-0.77%
7.79%
N/A
N/A
N/A
VT
5.36%
5.81%
2.26%
13.72%
12.04%
13.37%
9.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CCMG vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCMG has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CCMG vs. VT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CCMG
VT
CCMG vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CCM Global Equity ETF (CCMG) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
CCMG vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
CCMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than VT's 1.83% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCMG CCM Global Equity ETF | 2.23% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.83% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.44% |
Drawdowns
CCMG vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCMG drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCMG and VT.
Loading data...
Volatility
CCMG vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
CCM Global Equity ETF (CCMG) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) have volatilities of 3.66% and 3.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...