CCJ vs. MTA
Compare and contrast key facts about Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CCJ or MTA.
Performance
CCJ vs. MTA - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a 24.34% return, which is significantly higher than MTA's -0.16% return.
CCJ
24.34%
-7.64%
1.02%
20.39%
42.36%
11.86%
MTA
-0.16%
-20.54%
-2.69%
13.05%
-4.96%
N/A
Fundamentals
| CCJ | MTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23.68B | $290.74M |
| EPS | $0.20 | -$0.11 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $2.08B | $3.43M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $422.03M | $1.45M |
Key characteristics
| CCJ | MTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.56 | 0.17 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.05 | 0.70 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.13 | 1.08 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.73 | 0.12 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.74 | 0.60 |
| Ulcer Index | 14.03% | 15.77% |
| Daily Std Dev | 43.70% | 56.55% |
| Max Drawdown | -87.87% | -81.73% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.64% | -76.50% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between CCJ and MTA is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CCJ vs. MTA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CCJ vs. MTA - Dividend Comparison
CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while MTA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.16% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 3.36% | 2.88% | 2.50% | 2.19% | 1.85% |
MTA Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.79% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CCJ vs. MTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.87%, which is greater than MTA's maximum drawdown of -81.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and MTA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CCJ vs. MTA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is 10.42%, while Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) has a volatility of 18.42%. This indicates that CCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CCJ vs. MTA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities