CCJ vs. MTA
Compare and contrast key facts about Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CCJ or MTA.
Correlation
The correlation between CCJ and MTA is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CCJ vs. MTA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CCJ:
-0.20
MTA:
0.04
CCJ:
0.05
MTA:
0.47
CCJ:
1.01
MTA:
1.05
CCJ:
-0.24
MTA:
0.02
CCJ:
-0.49
MTA:
0.10
CCJ:
19.43%
MTA:
20.51%
CCJ:
48.33%
MTA:
53.57%
CCJ:
-87.86%
MTA:
-81.73%
CCJ:
-28.05%
MTA:
-76.23%
Fundamentals
CCJ:
$19.15B
MTA:
$286.73M
CCJ:
$0.28
MTA:
-$0.06
CCJ:
6.11
MTA:
48.75
CCJ:
3.97
MTA:
1.14
CCJ:
$2.50B
MTA:
$4.63M
CCJ:
$690.91M
MTA:
$2.88M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a -14.40% return, which is significantly lower than MTA's 23.90% return.
CCJ
-14.40%
1.71%
-18.06%
-10.34%
34.54%
10.86%
MTA
23.90%
5.42%
-19.22%
1.97%
-10.51%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CCJ vs. MTA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CCJ
MTA
CCJ vs. MTA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CCJ vs. MTA - Dividend Comparison
CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while MTA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.26% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 3.36% | 2.88% | 2.50% | 2.19% |
MTA Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.79% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CCJ vs. MTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.86%, which is greater than MTA's maximum drawdown of -81.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and MTA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CCJ vs. MTA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is 16.91%, while Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) has a volatility of 18.79%. This indicates that CCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CCJ vs. MTA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities