CCJ vs. MTA
Compare and contrast key facts about Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CCJ or MTA.
Key characteristics
| CCJ | MTA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.32% | -7.79% |
| 1Y Return | 82.28% | -45.42% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 39.05% | -32.16% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 35.36% | -2.97% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.41% | 15.51% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.11 | -0.89 |
| Daily Std Dev | 38.25% | 51.17% |
| Max Drawdown | -87.86% | -99.85% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.25% | -81.75% |
Fundamentals
| CCJ | MTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $21.43B | $290.81M |
| EPS | $0.61 | -$0.11 |
| PE Ratio | 80.90 | 226.80 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.59B | $4.60M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $629.11M | $2.97M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $502.90M | -$2.59M |
Correlation
The correlation between CCJ and MTA is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CCJ vs. MTA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly higher than MTA's -7.79% return. Over the past 10 years, CCJ has underperformed MTA with an annualized return of 10.41%, while MTA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.51% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CCJ vs. MTA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CCJ vs. MTA - Dividend Comparison
CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than MTA's 0.80% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.68% | 0.53% | 3.37% | 2.88% | 2.49% | 2.19% | 1.85% |
MTA Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. | 0.80% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.79% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CCJ vs. MTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.86%, smaller than the maximum MTA drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and MTA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CCJ vs. MTA - Volatility Comparison
Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) at 10.15%. This indicates that CCJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CCJ vs. MTA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities