CCJ vs. MTA
Compare and contrast key facts about Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CCJ or MTA.
Correlation
The correlation between CCJ and MTA is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CCJ vs. MTA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CCJ:
0.47
MTA:
-0.41
CCJ:
0.96
MTA:
-0.31
CCJ:
1.12
MTA:
0.97
CCJ:
0.63
MTA:
-0.26
CCJ:
1.50
MTA:
-1.44
CCJ:
14.08%
MTA:
14.95%
CCJ:
44.52%
MTA:
51.79%
CCJ:
-87.87%
MTA:
-81.73%
CCJ:
-13.46%
MTA:
-80.43%
Fundamentals
CCJ:
$23.28B
MTA:
$290.74M
CCJ:
$0.18
MTA:
-$0.11
CCJ:
$2.80B
MTA:
$5.05M
CCJ:
$592.87M
MTA:
$2.50M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a 23.00% return, which is significantly higher than MTA's -16.88% return.
CCJ
23.00%
-7.74%
1.52%
24.24%
44.28%
13.91%
MTA
-16.88%
-17.15%
-13.22%
-16.34%
-12.85%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CCJ vs. MTA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CCJ vs. MTA - Dividend Comparison
CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while MTA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 3.36% | 2.88% | 2.50% | 2.19% | 1.85% |
MTA Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.79% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CCJ vs. MTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.87%, which is greater than MTA's maximum drawdown of -81.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and MTA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CCJ vs. MTA - Volatility Comparison
Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a higher volatility of 12.08% compared to Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) at 11.10%. This indicates that CCJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CCJ vs. MTA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cameco Corporation and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities