CCJ vs. CANE
Compare and contrast key facts about Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE).
CANE is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CCJ or CANE.
Key characteristics
| CCJ | CANE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -6.43% | -6.06% |
| 1Y Return | 1.30% | -22.24% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 18.75% | 7.39% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 33.62% | 12.92% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.02% | -1.59% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.09 | -0.92 |
| Daily Std Dev | 43.58% | 23.32% |
| Max Drawdown | -87.86% | -81.30% |
| Current Drawdown | -27.35% | -55.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCJ and CANE is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CCJ vs. CANE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CCJ achieves a -6.43% return, which is significantly lower than CANE's -6.06% return. Over the past 10 years, CCJ has outperformed CANE with an annualized return of 9.02%, while CANE has yielded a comparatively lower -1.59% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CCJ vs. CANE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cameco Corporation (CCJ) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CCJ vs. CANE - Dividend Comparison
CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while CANE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.68% | 0.53% | 3.37% | 2.88% | 2.49% | 2.19% | 1.85% |
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CCJ vs. CANE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCJ drawdown since its inception was -87.86%, which is greater than CANE's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCJ and CANE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CCJ vs. CANE - Volatility Comparison
Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a higher volatility of 13.75% compared to Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) at 6.61%. This indicates that CCJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CANE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.