CCEP vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Coca-Cola European Partners plc (CCEP) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Performance
CCEP vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCEP vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCEP Coca-Cola European Partners plc | 1.96% | 21.20% | 18.35% | 24.50% | 2.33% | 15.61% | 0.48% | 13.85% | 18.58% | 30.72% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 1.26% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Fundamentals
CCEP:
$41.53B
PG:
$349.27B
CCEP:
$7.47
PG:
$6.75
CCEP:
12.39
PG:
21.34
CCEP:
0.61
PG:
5.22
CCEP:
1.01
PG:
4.12
CCEP:
5.30
PG:
6.55
CCEP:
$41.26B
PG:
$85.26B
CCEP:
$14.63B
PG:
$43.21B
CCEP:
$6.87B
PG:
$23.62B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCEP achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, CCEP has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 9.06%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.53% annualized return.
CCEP
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -14.47%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 4.36%
- 1Y
- 8.88%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 16.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.06%
PG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -11.88%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- -4.60%
- 1Y
- -13.20%
- 3Y*
- 1.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCEP vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
CCEP
PG
CCEP vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca-Cola European Partners plc (CCEP) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCEP | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | -0.70 | +1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | -0.87 | +1.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.90 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | -0.72 | +1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.15 | -1.33 | +2.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCEP | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | -0.70 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.23 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.45 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.46 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCEP and PG is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CCEP vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
CCEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than PG's 2.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCEP Coca-Cola European Partners plc | 2.52% | 2.57% | 2.77% | 2.95% | 3.07% | 2.90% | 2.01% | 2.71% | 2.73% | 2.97% | 3.65% | 2.27% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.93% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Drawdowns
CCEP vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCEP drawdown since its inception was -79.40%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEP and PG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCEP | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.40% | -54.25% | -25.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.89% | -18.31% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.52% | -23.77% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.76% | -23.77% | -24.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.25% | -17.11% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.40% | -12.15% | -12.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.90% | 9.89% | -1.99% |
Volatility
CCEP vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Coca-Cola European Partners plc (CCEP) has a higher volatility of 7.21% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 5.44%. This indicates that CCEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCEP | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 5.44% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.30% | 13.45% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.54% | 18.81% | +3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 17.45% | +5.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.44% | 18.84% | +8.60% |
Financials
CCEP vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coca-Cola European Partners plc and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CCEP vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
CCEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Coca-Cola European Partners plc reported a gross profit of 3.71B and revenue of 10.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.2%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 11.37B and revenue of 22.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.2%.
CCEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Coca-Cola European Partners plc reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 10.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 5.37B and revenue of 22.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.2%.
CCEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Coca-Cola European Partners plc reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 10.55B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 4.33B and revenue of 22.21B, resulting in a net margin of 19.5%.