CCEL vs. MUSA
CCEL (Cryo-Cell International, Inc.) and MUSA (Murphy USA Inc.) are both stocks. CCEL operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while MUSA operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CCEL returned 3.33%/yr vs 23.17%/yr for MUSA. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCEL vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCEL achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than MUSA's 34.73% return. Over the past 10 years, CCEL has underperformed MUSA with an annualized return of 3.33%, while MUSA has yielded a comparatively higher 23.17% annualized return.
CCEL
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- -10.39%
- 1Y
- -31.64%
- 3Y*
- -7.17%
- 5Y*
- -13.44%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
MUSA
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -8.44%
- YTD
- 34.73%
- 6M
- 39.25%
- 1Y
- 27.68%
- 3Y*
- 23.89%
- 5Y*
- 32.27%
- 10Y*
- 23.17%
CCEL vs. MUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCEL Cryo-Cell International, Inc. | 0.29% | -50.65% | 32.67% | 35.93% | -58.46% | 50.65% | 7.99% | -4.93% | -22.44% | 112.06% |
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 34.73% | -19.15% | 41.27% | 28.20% | 41.02% | 53.33% | 12.06% | 52.66% | -4.63% | 30.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCEL and MUSA is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013 | 0.01 |
Fundamentals
CCEL:
$27.79M
MUSA:
$10.14B
CCEL:
-$0.33
MUSA:
$28.85
CCEL:
0.89
MUSA:
0.53
CCEL:
$31.28M
MUSA:
$19.68B
CCEL:
$24.23M
MUSA:
$487.10M
CCEL:
-$1.14M
MUSA:
$1.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCEL vs. MUSA — Risk / Return Rank
CCEL
MUSA
CCEL vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cryo-Cell International, Inc. (CCEL) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCEL | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.16 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 1.41 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | 2.91 | -4.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCEL | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | 0.73 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 1.08 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 | 0.75 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.77 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
CCEL vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCEL drawdown since its inception was -76.11%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEL and MUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCEL | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.11% | -35.54% | -40.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.26% | -19.72% | -27.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.28% | -35.54% | -30.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.11% | -35.54% | -40.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.11% | -35.54% | -40.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.62% | -10.21% | -59.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.96% | -9.98% | -14.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.38% | 9.55% | +18.83% |
Volatility
CCEL vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison
Cryo-Cell International, Inc. (CCEL) has a higher volatility of 15.21% compared to Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) at 9.27%. This indicates that CCEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCEL | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.21% | 9.27% | +5.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.09% | 28.82% | +11.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.88% | 38.09% | +17.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.28% | 30.12% | +34.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.42% | 31.18% | +26.24% |
Dividends
CCEL vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison
CCEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCEL Cryo-Cell International, Inc. | 0.00% | 11.63% | 3.37% | 0.00% | 21.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 0.45% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
Financials
CCEL vs. MUSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cryo-Cell International, Inc. and Murphy USA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CCEL vs. MUSA - Profitability Comparison
CCEL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cryo-Cell International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.03M and revenue of 7.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.4%.
MUSA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CCEL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cryo-Cell International, Inc. reported an operating income of 765.13K and revenue of 7.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
MUSA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported an operating income of 205.20M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
CCEL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cryo-Cell International, Inc. reported a net income of 47.11K and revenue of 7.68M, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
MUSA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a net income of 136.30M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CCEL and MUSA have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCEL has higher volatility (15.21%) compared to MUSA (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCEL dropped -76.11% vs MUSA's -35.54%.
MUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCEL and MUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer