PortfoliosLab logo
CCEL vs. LLY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CCEL and LLY is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CCEL vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cryo-Cell International, Inc. (CCEL) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CCEL:

-0.60

LLY:

-0.27

Sortino Ratio

CCEL:

-0.61

LLY:

-0.11

Omega Ratio

CCEL:

0.93

LLY:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

CCEL:

-0.65

LLY:

-0.39

Martin Ratio

CCEL:

-1.52

LLY:

-0.73

Ulcer Index

CCEL:

25.24%

LLY:

13.53%

Daily Std Dev

CCEL:

66.23%

LLY:

38.44%

Max Drawdown

CCEL:

-96.67%

LLY:

-68.27%

Current Drawdown

CCEL:

-55.10%

LLY:

-24.32%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCEL:

$41.22M

LLY:

$651.06B

EPS

CCEL:

$0.01

LLY:

$12.30

PE Ratio

CCEL:

510.00

LLY:

58.49

PEG Ratio

CCEL:

0.00

LLY:

1.10

PS Ratio

CCEL:

1.28

LLY:

13.29

PB Ratio

CCEL:

9.72

LLY:

40.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCEL:

$32.10M

LLY:

$49.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCEL:

$24.33M

LLY:

$40.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCEL:

$3.99M

LLY:

$16.27B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCEL achieves a -26.83% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's -6.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CCEL has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 10.42%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 27.04% annualized return.


CCEL

YTD

-26.83%

1M

-4.89%

6M

-40.35%

1Y

-39.33%

3Y*

0.10%

5Y*

-2.99%

10Y*

10.42%

LLY

YTD

-6.05%

1M

-18.20%

6M

-7.98%

1Y

-10.35%

3Y*

31.86%

5Y*

38.02%

10Y*

27.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cryo-Cell International, Inc.

Eli Lilly and Company

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CCEL vs. LLY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCEL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CCEL is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CCEL is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CCEL is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CCEL is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CCEL is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CCEL is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LLY is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LLY is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LLY is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LLY is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LLY is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LLY is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CCEL vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cryo-Cell International, Inc. (CCEL) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CCEL Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCEL and LLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CCEL vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

CCEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.75%, more than LLY's 0.78% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CCEL
Cryo-Cell International, Inc.
12.75%3.37%0.00%21.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.78%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.95%2.46%2.77%2.37%2.84%

Drawdowns

CCEL vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCEL drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCEL and LLY.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CCEL vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cryo-Cell International, Inc. (CCEL) is 13.80%, while Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a volatility of 16.54%. This indicates that CCEL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CCEL vs. LLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cryo-Cell International, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20212022202320242025
7.97M
12.73B
(CCEL) Total Revenue
(LLY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCEL vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cryo-Cell International, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
75.1%
82.5%
(CCEL) Gross Margin
(LLY) Gross Margin
CCEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cryo-Cell International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.98M and revenue of 7.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.1%.

LLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 10.50B and revenue of 12.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.5%.

CCEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cryo-Cell International, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.06M and revenue of 7.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.

LLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 5.41B and revenue of 12.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.5%.

CCEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cryo-Cell International, Inc. reported a net income of 282.86K and revenue of 7.97M, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.

LLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 2.76B and revenue of 12.73B, resulting in a net margin of 21.7%.