CCD vs. UTF
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF).
Performance
CCD vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCD vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCD Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund | 4.16% | -4.26% | 35.89% | 7.98% | -28.00% | 20.33% | 45.75% | 41.60% | -9.64% | 26.56% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 9.32% | 9.93% | 22.37% | -3.83% | -9.60% | 17.91% | 6.93% | 42.74% | -9.87% | 34.10% |
Fundamentals
CCD:
$2.87
UTF:
$6.79
CCD:
7.44
UTF:
3.81
CCD:
0.06
UTF:
0.03
CCD:
5.29
UTF:
6.47
CCD:
$109.16M
UTF:
$387.16M
CCD:
$84.83M
UTF:
$388.42M
CCD:
$109.15M
UTF:
$765.72M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCD achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CCD has outperformed UTF with an annualized return of 12.73%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively lower 11.34% annualized return.
CCD
- 1D
- 4.91%
- 1M
- -6.38%
- YTD
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 7.08%
- 1Y
- 11.93%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- 1.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
UTF
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- 9.32%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- 1Y
- 10.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCD vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank
CCD
UTF
CCD vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCD | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 0.70 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.00 | 0.97 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.14 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 0.99 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.26 | 2.24 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCD | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 0.70 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.34 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.49 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.44 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCD and UTF is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CCD vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
CCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, more than UTF's 7.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCD Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund | 10.96% | 11.22% | 9.63% | 11.83% | 11.42% | 7.43% | 7.11% | 8.93% | 12.21% | 9.99% | 11.43% | 7.40% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 7.13% | 7.62% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% |
Drawdowns
CCD vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCD drawdown since its inception was -55.42%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCD and UTF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCD | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.42% | -72.62% | +17.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.89% | -11.99% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.54% | -30.28% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.42% | -52.53% | -2.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.71% | -4.42% | -2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.00% | -10.44% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.94% | 5.29% | -0.35% |
Volatility
CCD vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 4.56%. This indicates that CCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCD | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.75% | 4.56% | +4.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.76% | 9.43% | +4.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.89% | 15.70% | +4.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 18.51% | +1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.75% | 23.38% | +2.37% |
Financials
CCD vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities