CCD vs. UTF
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CCD or UTF.
Correlation
The correlation between CCD and UTF is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CCD vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CCD:
2.37
UTF:
1.40
CCD:
3.19
UTF:
2.08
CCD:
1.41
UTF:
1.24
CCD:
1.34
UTF:
1.14
CCD:
11.55
UTF:
6.90
CCD:
3.22%
UTF:
3.04%
CCD:
15.70%
UTF:
14.97%
CCD:
-55.42%
UTF:
-72.62%
CCD:
-1.32%
UTF:
-8.74%
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCD achieves a 38.67% return, which is significantly higher than UTF's 21.06% return.
CCD
38.67%
2.84%
17.48%
37.16%
13.55%
N/A
UTF
21.06%
-7.19%
10.45%
21.00%
5.82%
8.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CCD vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CCD vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
CCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than UTF's 7.82% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCD Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund | 9.36% | 11.83% | 11.42% | 7.43% | 7.11% | 9.47% | 12.21% | 9.99% | 11.43% | 7.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 7.82% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% | 6.51% | 6.99% |
Drawdowns
CCD vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCD drawdown since its inception was -55.42%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCD and UTF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CCD vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) is 4.12%, while Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that CCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CCD vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities