CCD vs. UTF
CCD (Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund) and UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, CCD returned 14.01%/yr vs 11.52%/yr for UTF. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCD vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCD achieves a 26.13% return, which is significantly higher than UTF's 16.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CCD has outperformed UTF with an annualized return of 14.01%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively lower 11.52% annualized return.
CCD
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 26.13%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- 1Y
- 45.94%
- 3Y*
- 17.28%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- 14.01%
UTF
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 16.77%
- 6M
- 16.96%
- 1Y
- 12.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.52%
CCD vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCD Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund | 26.13% | -4.26% | 35.89% | 7.98% | -28.00% | 20.33% | 45.75% | 41.60% | -9.64% | 26.56% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 16.77% | 9.93% | 22.37% | -3.83% | -9.60% | 17.91% | 6.93% | 42.74% | -9.87% | 34.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCD and UTF is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2015 | 0.36 |
Fundamentals
CCD:
$109.16M
UTF:
$387.16M
CCD:
$84.83M
UTF:
$388.42M
CCD:
$109.15M
UTF:
$765.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCD vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank
CCD
UTF
CCD vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCD | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.18 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 1.24 | +2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.09 | 2.52 | +15.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCD vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCD drawdown since its inception was -55.42%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCD and UTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCD | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.42% | -72.62% | +17.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -10.33% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.28% | -21.06% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.54% | -30.28% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.42% | -52.53% | -2.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -0.95% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -10.35% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 5.05% | -2.50% |
Volatility
CCD vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 2.43%. This indicates that CCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCD | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | 2.43% | +3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.43% | 8.34% | +7.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.28% | 12.40% | +5.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 18.28% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 23.35% | +2.53% |
Dividends
CCD vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
CCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.27%, more than UTF's 6.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCD Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund | 9.27% | 11.22% | 9.63% | 11.83% | 11.42% | 7.43% | 7.11% | 8.93% | 12.21% | 9.99% | 11.43% | 7.40% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 6.94% | 7.62% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% |
Financials
CCD vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CCD and UTF have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCD has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to UTF (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCD dropped -55.42% vs UTF's -72.62%.
CCD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCD and UTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer