CCD vs. UTF
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CCD or UTF.
Correlation
The correlation between CCD and UTF is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CCD vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CCD:
1.79
UTF:
1.52
CCD:
2.51
UTF:
2.23
CCD:
1.32
UTF:
1.26
CCD:
1.36
UTF:
1.40
CCD:
8.32
UTF:
5.65
CCD:
3.33%
UTF:
3.85%
CCD:
15.50%
UTF:
14.33%
CCD:
-55.42%
UTF:
-72.62%
CCD:
-2.07%
UTF:
-4.91%
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCD achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 3.08% return.
CCD
1.27%
0.67%
8.62%
29.05%
11.95%
N/A
UTF
3.08%
0.15%
4.59%
21.31%
5.55%
9.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CCD vs. UTF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CCD
UTF
CCD vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CCD vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
CCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.58%, more than UTF's 7.60% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCD Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund | 9.58% | 9.63% | 11.83% | 11.42% | 7.43% | 7.11% | 9.47% | 12.21% | 9.99% | 11.43% | 7.40% | 0.00% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 7.60% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% | 6.51% |
Drawdowns
CCD vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCD drawdown since its inception was -55.42%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCD and UTF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CCD vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund (CCD) is 2.81%, while Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that CCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CCD vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Income Fund and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities